Did Ancient Humans Live Longer? Uncovering the Truth Behind the Myth

The Curious Claim: Did People Really Live to 900?

We’ve all heard the stories. Biblical figures like Methuselah supposedly lived hundreds of years. Some say people in ancient times were healthier, more in tune with nature, ate fewer processed foods (obviously), and therefore lived much longer.
But is there any scientific truth to that? Or is it all legend, wishful thinking, and a bit of exaggeration?

Let’s dig into it.

What Do We Know from Actual Archaeological Evidence?

Life expectancy vs. maximum lifespan

First, we need to separate two things people often confuse:

• Life expectancy: the average number of years people in a group live

• Maximum lifespan: the longest that any individual can live

In ancient societies, the average life expectancy was shockingly low.
Think 25–35 years for many hunter-gatherer groups. But hold up! That doesn’t mean everyone dropped dead at 30. A lot of that number is brought down by insane infant mortality rates. If you survived childhood, you had a decent shot at reaching 50, 60, sometimes 70.

So no, people didn’t routinely die in their 30s. But they weren’t blowing out 120 birthday candles either.

Skeletal records tell a clearer story

Paleopathologists (basically, bone detectives) analyze ancient skeletons to estimate age at death. Across cultures – from early Homo sapiens to ancient Egyptians – most adult remains point to deaths before 60.
Yes, a few elderly individuals existed. But they were rare and probably treated as elders or wise ones – just like grandma now, but with fewer teeth.

Myths, Legends, and... Exaggerations?

The Bible and ancient texts

Take Genesis. People living 600, 800, even 900+ years. Wild, right? But many scholars believe these numbers were symbolic, not literal. Some suggest those numbers may refer to dynastic reigns, family lineages, or had numerological meanings.

Same thing in Sumerian texts: kings reigning for “thousands of years.” Again, more likely myth-making than honest biography.

Let’s be real: it’s hard to imagine someone farming, fighting, and having kids for nine centuries without Advil or indoor plumbing.

What About the "Natural Lifestyle" Argument?

Yes, ancient diets were different...

People love to say, “Well, they ate cleaner, moved more, had no McDonald’s...” And sure, their food was less processed, and they got a lot more walking in.

But also:

• No antibiotics

• No vaccines

• No surgery

• No dental care

• No protection from bacteria, viruses, or even a simple cut gone bad

You get the picture. Natural lifestyle = not necessarily longer life.

Survival was hard

Imagine this:
You’re 38. You just delivered your fifth baby (no epidural, obviously), and now you have to gather roots, cook for the tribe, and avoid getting mauled by a boar.
Old age? That’s a luxury, not a given.

So... Did Ancient Humans Live Longer?

The short answer: Nope, not really

Ancient humans didn’t live longer than we do today. In fact, thanks to modern medicine, hygiene, and science, we’re living longer than ever.
The global average life expectancy today is over 70. In developed countries, it can top 80 or more. That’s huge compared to any era before the 20th century.

But some individuals did live long

Yes, even in ancient times, a lucky few made it to old age. They were probably genetically gifted, resilient, and had a bit of luck. But it wasn’t the norm – not even close.

Final Thoughts: Romanticizing the Past vs. Facing Reality

It’s tempting to believe ancient humans had some secret to long life – that maybe we’ve lost touch with some golden-age wisdom. And sure, we can learn from their relationship to the earth, their movement, their simpler diets.

But when it comes to lifespan, we’re doing pretty darn well right now.
Better medicine. Better food (mostly). Better chances.

Long story short: ancient people didn’t live longer – they just lived differently.
Let’s stop wishing we were cavemen with Wi-Fi and appreciate how far we’ve come.

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.