Does Peer-Reviewed Mean Scholarly? Debunking the Myths

You’ve probably heard the term “peer-reviewed” tossed around when discussing academic research or scholarly articles. But here’s the burning question: Does peer-reviewed really mean scholarly? Many people assume these terms are interchangeable, but there’s a subtle (and sometimes crucial) difference. Let’s dive in and break down this common misconception!

Understanding Peer-Reviewed

Before we can figure out if peer-reviewed means scholarly, we need to understand what “peer-reviewed” actually means. In the simplest terms, a peer-reviewed article is one that has been evaluated by experts in the field before being published.

The Peer Review Process

When an academic article is submitted for publication in a scholarly journal, it is sent to other experts (peers) in the subject area. These experts evaluate the quality, accuracy, and relevance of the research. They provide feedback to the author, suggest improvements, and ultimately decide whether the article is worthy of publication.

It’s a process designed to ensure that the research is solid, credible, and free of errors. It’s like getting a second opinion from someone who knows what they’re talking about. I remember my first time submitting an article for peer review—it felt like sending my baby off to get judged! But, looking back, I see how essential the process is for ensuring quality work.

Is Peer-Reviewed Automatically Scholarly?

Now, the real question: Does peer-reviewed mean scholarly? Well, not exactly. Here’s why.

Peer-Reviewed Doesn’t Guarantee Scholarly Content

Just because an article is peer-reviewed doesn’t automatically make it scholarly. Peer review is a quality control process, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that the content of the article is groundbreaking, in-depth, or even the best available on the subject.

Take this from experience: not all journals are created equal. Some journals are incredibly prestigious and publish articles that push the boundaries of knowledge. Others might be more niche or have lower standards for review. A peer-reviewed article in a questionable journal might still lack scholarly rigor.

Scholarly Articles Have Specific Characteristics

To be truly considered scholarly, an article must meet certain criteria. Scholarly articles are typically written by experts or researchers in a specific field and are published in well-established academic journals. They include extensive references to other credible sources, present original research, and usually follow a formal structure (such as an abstract, methodology, and conclusion).

I remember discussing this with my friend Sarah, who works in academia. She once told me, "Just because it’s peer-reviewed doesn’t mean it’s the kind of source you’d use for a dissertation!" And she’s absolutely right. Scholarly articles are often more comprehensive, with a deeper dive into a topic.

How to Identify Scholarly Sources

Okay, so if peer-reviewed doesn’t always equal scholarly, how can you be sure you’re using true scholarly sources? Here are some tips:

1. Check the Journal’s Reputation

Start by looking into the reputation of the journal where the article was published. Well-known, respected journals in the field (like Nature or The Lancet) tend to have high standards for both peer review and scholarly content. But if the journal seems obscure or doesn’t have a clear editorial board, proceed with caution.

2. Look for Citations and References

Scholarly articles usually cite a lot of other studies and references. If the article you’re reading only references a few sources or doesn’t cite anything at all, that’s a red flag. True scholarly work builds on existing research.

3. Examine the Author’s Credentials

Authors of scholarly articles are usually researchers, professors, or experts in their field. If the article was written by someone with solid academic credentials and experience, that’s a good sign. If you don’t see any qualifications or institutional affiliations, be skeptical.

Can You Trust Peer-Reviewed Articles for Your Research?

While peer-reviewed articles are usually more reliable than non-reviewed sources, they still have to be evaluated carefully. As I’ve mentioned before, just because an article has been peer-reviewed doesn’t necessarily mean it’s top-tier scholarly work.

Stay Critical

This is where critical thinking becomes essential. Always look at the article as a whole—its methodology, its references, and its conclusions. And don’t forget to check for biases or potential conflicts of interest, especially if the journal isn’t very well-known or if the author has affiliations that could affect the research's objectivity.

Peer-Reviewed Doesn’t Mean Flawless

Remember that even peer-reviewed articles can have errors or weaknesses. No review process is perfect, and peer reviewers are human too. This is why it’s important to cross-reference information and seek out additional opinions.

Conclusion: Peer-Reviewed Doesn’t Always Mean Scholarly

So, does peer-reviewed mean scholarly? Not always. Peer-reviewed means the article has been vetted by experts, but scholarly content goes much deeper. A scholarly article is comprehensive, well-researched, and carefully crafted, typically published in reputable journals. The peer review process ensures quality but doesn’t guarantee that the article is top-tier scholarly work.

As you conduct your own research, remember: don’t take everything at face value. Check the journal, assess the references, and evaluate the author’s qualifications. Only then can you be confident that you’re using truly scholarly sources.

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.