What Is the Titans Tuck Rule? The NFL Confusion Explained
Understanding the original “tuck rule” in NFL history
Before diving into the “Titans tuck rule,” we’ve gotta rewind a bit. The original tuck rule became infamous after the 2001 AFC Divisional Playoff game between the Patriots and Raiders. Tom Brady was hit, lost the ball, and — long story short — it was ruled not a fumble because his arm was moving forward slightly. The “tuck rule” said that if a QB starts a throwing motion, even if he tries to tuck the ball back in, it’s still an incomplete pass — not a fumble.
Yeah, confusing. Raiders fans still aren’t over it. And honestly? Can’t blame ‘em.
That rule stuck around until 2013, when the NFL finally ditched it because it caused way too much controversy and, let’s be real, made things messy.
So… what’s the “Titans tuck rule” then?
It’s not an official rule — it’s a viral phrase
Here’s the kicker: there’s no official rule in the NFL Rulebook called the “Titans tuck rule.” The term popped up as a sort of inside joke or nickname for a specific controversial moment involving the Tennessee Titans. It echoes the old tuck rule fiasco — but with a twist.
The most talked-about instance? Week 12, 2023 NFL season. Titans were playing a tight game, and a key fumble was ruled incomplete after review. The QB was in the process of pulling the ball back in (very tuck rule vibes). Fans — especially Titans fans — went wild on social media, calling it the “Titans tuck rule.”
It stuck. Even though it’s not in the actual rulebook.
Fans turned frustration into a meme
Much like how the “Butt Fumble” became a cultural artifact, the “Titans tuck rule” became shorthand for “we got robbed by a weird technicality.” It’s part meme, part fan therapy, part real annoyance at the NFL’s complex officiating.
NFL’s stance on the Titans-style tuck play
Was the ref’s call technically correct?
According to league analysts and former refs (yeah, they interviewed a bunch post-game), the decision technically followed current rules. The quarterback’s arm had “started the forward motion” — and that’s enough under Rule 3, Section 22, Article 4 to call it an incomplete pass, not a fumble.
So... like it or not, the call was by the book. Still felt unfair though. Even some neutral fans were like, “man, that’s soft.”
Why these calls still feel wrong
The problem isn’t just the rule. It’s how subjective it is. Did the QB really intend to pass? Was it tucked in enough to count as possession? It’s the kind of gray area that drives people nuts — and gives birth to terms like the “Titans tuck rule.”
Reactions from players, coaches, and the NFL world
Titans coach didn’t hold back
After the game, Titans head coach Mike Vrabel (never one to mince words) said something like, “We’ve seen that before. The rule’s vague, and it bit us this time.” He didn’t call it unfair, but you could tell he was boiling under the surface.
Players? Same story. A few tweeted cryptic stuff — one just posted “🤡” after the game. Draw your own conclusions.
Social media had a meltdown
On X (Twitter, whatever), the phrase “Titans tuck rule” trended within an hour. Memes flew. Raiders fans (yup, those Raiders fans) even jumped in like “welcome to the club.”
Honestly? It was kind of hilarious. And also kind of sad. Because it reminded everyone how even 20+ years later, the NFL still struggles with rule clarity.
Final thoughts: will the “Titans tuck rule” change anything?
Maybe. The NFL does review controversial calls after the season, and if there’s enough backlash (which... there was), they might look into refining the language around forward motion and possession.
But don’t expect miracles. This isn’t the first time a team felt burned by a judgment call — and it won’t be the last.
The “Titans tuck rule” might not be in the rulebook, but it’s forever burned into fan memory. Another chapter in the NFL’s long, weird relationship with what counts — and what doesn’t — on the field.
How much height should a boy have to look attractive?
Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.
Is 172 cm good for a man?
Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.
Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?
The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.
Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?
How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).
How tall is a average 15 year old?
Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
| Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years) | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14 Years | 112.0 lb. (50.8 kg) | 64.5" (163.8 cm) |
| 15 Years | 123.5 lb. (56.02 kg) | 67.0" (170.1 cm) |
| 16 Years | 134.0 lb. (60.78 kg) | 68.3" (173.4 cm) |
| 17 Years | 142.0 lb. (64.41 kg) | 69.0" (175.2 cm) |
How to get taller at 18?
Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.
Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?
Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).
Can you grow between 16 and 18?
Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.
Can you grow 1 cm after 17?
Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.