Which Child Is Most Likely to Be Rich? Surprising Truths Revealed

Does birth order really affect future wealth?

You’ve probably heard this one before: “Firstborns are the most responsible” or “Middle kids are creative”. But what about money — specifically, who’s most likely to end up rich?

Turns out, birth order might actually have something to do with it. But it’s not that simple (yeah, sorry — no magic formula here). Studies, family dynamics, personality traits… it all plays a role.

Let’s break it down.

Firstborns: Leaders in the making?

Firstborns tend to be structured, disciplined, and achievement-oriented. They're often the ones parents experiment with (poor kids), and that means higher expectations from day one.

Some research — like that from the University of Leipzig — shows firstborns are more likely to pursue leadership roles. Which could, in theory, lead to more wealth. Think CEOs, lawyers, surgeons.

But wait, here’s the twist: being responsible doesn’t always equal being rich. Some firstborns play it too safe. They might stick to stable, high-paying jobs… but not always the crazy rich kind.

Middle children: The underrated dark horses?

Middle kids often get left out of the spotlight — no "firstborn attention," no "youngest baby treatment." But hey, that might be their superpower.

Studies suggest middle children develop strong negotiation and social skills. They learn to adapt, find their place, and think outside the box. Entrepreneurship? Not uncommon among them.

They might not seek traditional success, but they can surprise you. Steve Forbes? Middle child. Warren Buffet? Also a middle kid. Coincidence? Maybe. But worth noting.

A buddy of mine — classic middle child, grew up in a family of five — built a successful app and sold it before 30. Said he learned early how to “get noticed without being the loudest in the room.” That kinda stuck with me.

Youngest children: Creative, bold… and rich?

The baby of the family tends to be the risk-taker. They grow up watching their siblings, break more rules, and often develop into the entertainers, creatives, or visionaries of the group.

A study from the University of Birmingham suggests youngest children are more likely to go into creative fields — acting, design, entrepreneurship. Fields that can lead to high earnings… or total failure.

They might shoot for the moon more often than their siblings. Some miss. Some become Elon Musk. (Okay not literally, he’s actually a firstborn — but you get the idea.)

Are youngest kids reckless or genius?

Depends. They often have less pressure, which gives them freedom to try unconventional paths. But without discipline, that freedom can fizzle. Still, many high-risk, high-reward careers are full of “youngest child energy.”

Other factors that matter (more than birth order)

Honestly? Birth order is just one tiny part of the puzzle.

Parenting style

A strict household with lots of structure might push kids to succeed. But too much pressure can backfire. Meanwhile, a chill home might boost creativity but lack financial literacy.

Socioeconomic background

Let’s be real: being born into a wealthy or well-educated family increases your chances of being rich — regardless of whether you're first, middle, or last.

Personality traits

Traits like grit, curiosity, resilience, and yes — even luck — can matter more than birth order. A youngest child with no ambition won’t get far. A middle child who hustles? Game on.

So… which child is most likely to be rich?

Okay, here’s the real talk:

• Firstborns might earn more on average (due to traditional career paths and leadership roles).

• Middle children might create more wealth (thanks to flexibility and social skills).

• Youngest kids might risk their way into riches (or flames).

In other words: there’s no single winner.

But if you had to bet? Maybe the middle child — they balance ambition with adaptability. Then again… it depends on the kid.

So instead of stressing over birth order, maybe focus on nurturing independence, creativity, and persistence — that’s what really builds wealth.

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.