Why Don’t Hockey Players Wear Full Masks? The Surprising Truth

Hockey’s Dangerous Yet Thrilling Nature

Hockey is one of the most exhilarating and fast-paced sports in the world. With players zooming across the ice at high speeds, throwing hard pucks, and engaging in physical contact, it's no surprise that injuries are part of the game. But here's the question that has probably crossed your mind if you're a fan or just a curious observer: Why don’t hockey players wear full masks?

It seems like common sense, right? Protect your face, avoid injuries. Yet, many professional hockey players don’t wear full face shields or masks, even though they’re playing a contact sport with high-risk elements. So, what's the deal?

The Evolution of Hockey Masks: Why the Change?

To understand why full masks aren’t common in hockey, it’s important to look at the history of hockey player safety gear. The game has evolved, but so has the attitude toward protection.

1. The Tradition of Half Masks and Visors

For a long time, hockey players were limited to wearing half-masks or visors that only covered the eyes or parts of the face. A lot of this came down to tradition and the mentality that wearing a full mask somehow restricted vision or affected gameplay.

When I chatted with my friend Kevin, a hockey coach, he explained how players historically resisted full masks. "There was this tough guy image," he said. "The idea was, if you wore a full mask, you weren’t as tough as the guys who didn't." It’s hard to believe, but it was the mindset for many years.

2. The Goalkeeper Mask Inspiration

The development of the goalkeeper mask, popularized by players like Gerry Cheevers in the 1970s, slowly started influencing other players' views on full-face protection. However, this mask was designed for goalies, not skaters. For non-goalie players, wearing a full mask was still seen as a novelty for quite some time.

But why, then, do skaters today not seem to adopt them as commonly? Let’s dig deeper.

The Psychological Factors Behind Wearing Masks

Hockey players are often considered some of the toughest athletes out there. They’re known for pushing through pain and playing with little regard for their own safety (within reason, of course). The decision to not wear a full mask often comes down to mental and emotional factors.

1. Visibility and Comfort

One major argument against full-face masks is visibility. Hockey is a fast-paced game, and players argue that full masks can obstruct their peripheral vision, which is crucial in a game that involves quick passes and puck handling. In fact, a lot of players feel that wearing a full shield feels "restrictive" and slows them down, even if it means compromising some safety.

I once spoke with Alex, a former hockey player, who mentioned, "I wore a full face shield in the minors, but when I made it to pro-level play, I couldn’t stand it anymore. I felt like I couldn’t see as clearly, and it made me slower on the ice."

2. The "Toughness" Factor

The psychological aspect cannot be overlooked either. For many hockey players, the sport is about showing grit and toughness, and this mentality often leads to avoiding full face protection. Wearing a full mask might be seen by some as a sign of weakness, as they believe they’re tougher without it. There’s a certain pride in battling through the hits, cuts, and scrapes.

Changing Attitudes: The Growing Adoption of Full Masks

While there’s always been resistance, the trend is slowly changing, especially with younger players. Many young athletes today are more open to wearing full-face protection, seeing it as a way to prevent unnecessary injuries, especially facial fractures or eye injuries, which can be career-threatening.

1. Impact of Player Safety Campaigns

In recent years, there’s been an increased focus on player safety across all sports, including hockey. The NHL, for example, has made adjustments to equipment regulations over time to improve safety and protect players. Newer players are more likely to wear full face shields or visors than older generations of players.

2. The Role of Social Media and Fan Influence

Interestingly, social media has played a role in pushing players to think more about safety. Fans and media outlets often highlight injuries, and players now face more pressure to protect themselves. The injury of well-known players or the rise of personal stories shared by athletes also contributes to changing attitudes toward wearing full masks.

Risks Players Face Without Full Masks

Let’s be honest, the risk of injury is always a real concern in hockey, and there are consequences to not wearing full face protection.

1. Facial Injuries: More Common Than You Think

Facial injuries, such as fractures, lacerations, or even lost teeth, are not rare in hockey. In fact, they’re common enough that players often suffer cuts from high-speed pucks or sticks. Max Pacioretty, a star player in the NHL, is one example of a player who suffered a horrific facial injury. His experience only added to the ongoing debate on full protection.

2. Eye Injuries: A Career-Altering Risk

Eye injuries are perhaps one of the most dangerous threats. Even with a visor or half-mask, a stray puck or stick could cause permanent damage to a player’s vision. It’s one of those risks that many players are willing to take, but it’s important to consider that a single eye injury could be career-ending.

Conclusion: Is the Risk Worth It?

So, why don’t hockey players wear full masks? The answer isn’t simple. For some, it’s about tradition, visibility, and a desire to maintain that tough persona. But, as awareness of safety issues continues to grow and attitudes shift, we might see more players opting for full face protection in the future.

It’s interesting to think about how sports evolve over time. Maybe in a few years, full masks will become the norm, especially as player safety becomes a bigger priority. For now, though, it's a mix of tradition, personal preference, and the thrill of the game that keeps many players from fully covering up.

Have you ever thought about this before? Would you prefer if all players wore full face protection, or do you think the current system is fine? Let me know your thoughts!

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.