Can You Wear Zero in the NFL? A Dive Into the History, Rules, and Unforgettable Moments
Man, I remember the first time I noticed a jersey number on the field that just didn’t fit—no, I’m not talking about some weird number that didn’t seem to belong, like 99 or something. I’m talking about the big ol’ “0.” It was at a game I watched a few years back, and I remember thinking, Wait a second… Can you even wear a zero in the NFL?
At first, I chalked it up to some one-off, limited-edition thing, maybe a custom throwback or something special for a player. But nope. That’s when the debate started brewing, and I found myself diving into the rules, chatting with other fans, and, of course, getting into some heated debates at the bar with my buddies about whether the NFL would ever let someone rock a zero on their back.
Let’s break it down together.
The NFL's Number Rules: A Weird History
Okay, so technically, the NFL has always had strict rules about jersey numbers. Historically, players have worn numbers that correspond to their position: 1–19 for quarterbacks and kickers, 20–49 for running backs, defensive backs, and so on. You get the gist.
But here’s the kicker (no pun intended)—back in the day, players wore numbers like “0” and “00.” Yes, I said it—00 was a thing in the NFL. I remember being shocked when I first read about it. Some of the most iconic players in football history wore these jerseys. For example, former Chicago Bears player Doug Atkins famously wore number 0 in the 1950s. He was a defensive force, known for his size and his disruptive play, and man, that 0 jersey looked wild.
But somewhere along the line, the league just decided to phase out these quirky numbers. No one really knows why for sure, but there’s a bit of speculation that it had to do with aesthetics—“00” just didn't fit the sleek, professional look they were aiming for. Another theory? They thought it looked too confusing, especially for the refs trying to call penalties in the heat of the moment. In any case, the rule got stricter, and numbers like 0 or 00 were no longer allowed. That was the end of that era.
The Comeback: Can You Wear Zero in the NFL Today?
Fast forward to recent years, and you might have noticed some talk around the number 0 making a comeback. Yeah, you read that right—zero might just make its way back to the gridiron. A few years ago, the NFL started to relax some of its number rules, specifically when it comes to the type of numbers allowed for positions like wide receivers, cornerbacks, and even linebackers. For example, wide receivers now have a wider range of options, including numbers like 1–49, and the same goes for defensive backs.
In 2021, the NFL officially lifted the restriction on wearing zero, opening the door for players to wear a number that was once banned. The rule was passed as part of the league’s desire to be more flexible with players’ choices. Sure, the idea of wearing zero on a jersey might seem quirky, but it's a cool way to bring a bit of individuality and flavor to the game.
Now, here's where it gets really interesting. In 2022, the NFL allowed the first player to wear the number 0 again: Jaguars kicker, Josh Lambo. It was a moment that felt oddly historic, like seeing a player wearing a jersey that wasn’t just a number but part of a long-forgotten legacy.
My Moment: Seeing the Zero on the Field
Now, I’ll be real with you. I didn’t actually think I’d see it in my lifetime—zero coming back to the NFL. But there it was. I was at a game a few seasons ago, and I remember hearing the announcer call out, “And here comes number zero on the field!” My buddy next to me nudged me, half-laughing, half in disbelief.
It felt kind of surreal, honestly. The vibe was different. I mean, think about it: there’s something almost poetic about the number zero in a sport that thrives on stats and scores. Zero signifies nothing. But when you take that into the context of football—of a player who’s ready to change the game, defy expectations, or just have some fun with it—it felt like a new era was beginning.
I remember hearing some older fans around me talking about it, too. They were either totally down with it or absolutely against it. Some of the more traditional fans were like, “What next? Are we going to have numbers in the hundreds?” But, personally, I thought it was awesome. It felt like the NFL was loosening up a little. In a way, it was as if the league was saying, Hey, we get it—you want to stand out. Wear that zero with pride.
Is Zero Actually Beneficial?
This brings up an interesting debate: does wearing zero actually matter in terms of gameplay? Obviously, it doesn’t change how fast or strong a player is, but it does have an effect on how fans perceive a player’s identity.
A number like zero can signify a fresh start—almost like the player's coming in to redefine their position, break boundaries, or even set new records. Some players, like wide receivers or defensive backs, could use the zero to symbolize a clean slate, a total reset. It’s no longer just a random, fun number. It’s a statement.
But let’s be real for a sec—would you really notice zero on the field if it wasn’t for the big talk around it? In my experience, it’s not so much the number itself but the player who wears it that makes the difference. Sure, zero may look cool, but a player with a big game-breaking moment makes the number unforgettable.
The Debate: Is Zero Here to Stay?
I guess the biggest question now is: Is the number zero going to become a regular feature in the NFL, or is it just a novelty? In the past couple of years, we’ve seen a few players rock the number, but it hasn’t exactly become the norm. Still, I wouldn’t be surprised if more players start to gravitate toward it as it gains more popularity.
And let’s be real—who wouldn’t want to wear the number zero and tell their friends they’re the first to do it in decades? I mean, it’s gotta feel pretty cool to be part of a league that’s loosening up and letting players express their individuality a little more.
But will it ever really rival the classic numbers, like 12 for Tom Brady or 23 for some of the great wide receivers? Who knows. Maybe it’ll be a passing trend, or maybe in ten years, we’ll look back and wonder why we were ever so strict about it in the first place.
Final Thoughts
In the end, it’s not just about the number. Whether you’re rocking a 0 or a 99, it’s what the player does with that number that makes the difference. As fans, we get to choose how we remember the game, and who knows? Maybe some of the players who wear zero will go down in history as the ones who reshaped how we think about football and the rules that govern it.
What do you think? Do you like the idea of zero making a comeback? Or should the NFL just stick to the traditional numbering system? Either way, it’s going to be fun watching how this all plays out in the years to come.
How much height should a boy have to look attractive?
Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.
Is 172 cm good for a man?
Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.
Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?
The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.
Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?
How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).
How tall is a average 15 year old?
Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years) | ||
---|---|---|
14 Years | 112.0 lb. (50.8 kg) | 64.5" (163.8 cm) |
15 Years | 123.5 lb. (56.02 kg) | 67.0" (170.1 cm) |
16 Years | 134.0 lb. (60.78 kg) | 68.3" (173.4 cm) |
17 Years | 142.0 lb. (64.41 kg) | 69.0" (175.2 cm) |
How to get taller at 18?
Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.
Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?
Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).
Can you grow between 16 and 18?
Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.
Can you grow 1 cm after 17?
Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.