Is Football Manager more realistic than FIFA?

Is Football Manager More Realistic Than FIFA? A Deep Dive

Football Manager vs FIFA: A Clash of Realism

Well, if you’re anything like me, you’ve probably spent countless hours arguing with your friends or online about which game is more realistic: Football Manager or FIFA? It's a debate that’s almost as old as these two games themselves. And while both have their merits, there’s one thing we can all agree on: they’re both trying to capture the essence of football, just in very different ways.

Actually, I’ve been playing both for years, and recently, I started to wonder: Is Football Manager more realistic than FIFA? Let’s break it down and see what makes each game stand out when it comes to realism.

The Gameplay Experience: Simulation vs Arcade

FIFA: Fast, Fun, and Glitzy

Honestly, FIFA is all about that fast-paced, action-packed gameplay. The focus here is on providing a real-time football experience where you can control every aspect of the game, from the passes to the shots, and even the celebrations. But, as much as it feels real during a match, it’s definitely more of an arcade experience. The physics feel good, but it’s not exactly how you'd experience football in real life. For example, have you ever tried to dribble past an entire defense in FIFA and just breezed through? Yeah, not happening in real life.

But that’s the beauty of FIFA—it’s designed to be fun, not a strict simulation. You get that instant gratification, but it's more about enjoying the spectacle of football rather than simulating every aspect of it.

Football Manager: A Manager’s Dream

On the other hand, Football Manager is, well, a completely different beast. It’s all about the details. If you’ve ever spent hours pouring over tactics, transfers, and player development in FM, you know what I mean. Football Manager doesn't let you take control of the match itself, but instead focuses on the nuances of managing a football club, from the boardroom to the training ground.

In terms of realism, FM is on another level. The sheer depth of player stats, team dynamics, and the way injuries, form, and morale affect gameplay are incredibly accurate. Honestly, I can get lost in it for hours just making sure every aspect of my club is running smoothly. It's like being a real-life football manager, minus the stress of actual game day decisions (well, kind of).

Player and Team Management: Who Does It Better?

FIFA: More Casual, but Enjoyable

In FIFA, team management is pretty straightforward. You can adjust tactics, formation, and substitutions, but that's about it. While you can tweak the player’s roles during matches, it doesn’t go as deep as Football Manager. It’s easy to jump in, make a few changes, and get back to the action. But, well, when was the last time you managed a player's long-term development in FIFA? Exactly. FIFA is made to be accessible and fast-paced, not a true reflection of the intricacies of managing a team.

Football Manager: Tactical Mastery

When it comes to management depth, Football Manager is the clear winner. The game allows you to set detailed tactics, negotiate player contracts, monitor player fitness, and even manage press conferences (which, let’s be real, can be a headache in real life). You can dive into every single stat of a player, from their mental attributes like determination and teamwork to their physical stats like stamina and agility.

I remember my first season as a manager in FM. I thought I could just build a squad, throw them on the pitch, and win. Boy, was I wrong. Managing a team’s morale, handling player transfers, balancing the budget—it all felt way more like real-life football management than FIFA ever could.

Match Realism: Where Football Manager Shines

FIFA: The Thrill of the Match

Let’s face it—FIFA is all about the match. When you're on the pitch, everything looks great. The graphics are stunning, and the atmosphere is electric. The match simulation in FIFA is as close as you can get to a real-life game without actually playing, but it doesn’t go much beyond that. The realism is there, but only for a few minutes.

The flow of the match is exciting, and you'll find yourself completely immersed in the moment, especially when you pull off an amazing goal or a game-winning tackle. But, the deeper aspects of how a team’s strategy and long-term management shape the match are not represented.

Football Manager: Real Tactics, Real Decisions

In Football Manager, though, you don’t play the match—you plan for it. The real magic happens before the game starts, with pre-match tactics and in-game decisions that reflect how football works at the highest level. Substitutions, halftime team talks, and tactical shifts are all part of your decision-making. And, unlike FIFA, where you can just change tactics and go back into a match, Football Manager forces you to think about the long-term consequences of your actions. It’s not just about the next match—it’s about how each decision you make influences the season.

Final Thoughts: FIFA vs Football Manager

Honestly, both games are incredible, but Football Manager is more realistic in terms of managing a team. If you want to feel like a real football manager, analyzing players, negotiating deals, and crafting strategies, FM is for you. But if you’re more about fast, action-packed football, then FIFA is the way to go.

I’ve spent hours in Football Manager, tweaking tactics, scouting players, and feeling that rush of landing a top prospect. And I’ve had moments in FIFA where the excitement of a match kept me on the edge of my seat. Ultimately, the question isn’t about which is more realistic—it’s about what kind of football experience you’re looking for.

For me, Football Manager gives the depth and immersion that real football fans crave. But for that quick fix of football excitement? Nothing beats FIFA.

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.