What Is an Argument Against the Existence of God Called?

Understanding the Term: Atheistic Arguments

Let’s get right into it. An argument against the existence of God is generally known as an atheistic argument. Some folks also call it a counter-theistic or anti-theistic argument, depending on the tone and purpose. But yeah, "atheistic argument" is the umbrella term that most philosophers and thinkers go with.

Now, does that mean it's always just about saying “God doesn’t exist”? Not exactly. There are layers. Some of these arguments try to prove that God's existence is logically impossible. Others say it’s just really unlikely.

Classic Atheistic Argument Types

• Logical arguments (e.g. the Problem of Evil)

• Empirical arguments (e.g. lack of observable evidence)

• Psychological or sociological arguments (e.g. religion as human construct)

Funny enough, even some believers engage with these arguments seriously — just to sharpen their own faith.

The Problem of Evil: The Heavyweight Contender

Ah yes, the infamous Problem of Evil. Probably the most well-known atheistic argument. It basically says:

If God is all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good, why does evil exist in the world?

Seems like a pretty straightforward question, right? But it’s tripped up thinkers for centuries.

Logical vs. Evidential Evil

Let’s break it down:

• Logical Problem of Evil: Evil’s existence contradicts the definition of an all-good, all-powerful God.

• Evidential Problem of Evil: Okay, maybe not a contradiction, but there’s just too much suffering — it’s statistically unlikely such a God exists.

Some theists respond with "free will defense" or "soul-making theodicies" — but honestly, not all of them are very convincing (depends on your standards, I guess).

The Burden of Proof Flip: Who Has to Prove What?

Here’s where things get spicy. Some atheists argue that they don’t have to “disprove” God. Instead, the burden of proof is on the person making the claim — in this case, the theist.

It’s kinda like saying, "If someone tells you there’s an invisible dragon in their garage, they have to show it exists — you don’t have to prove it doesn’t."

Sounds cheeky, but it’s actually a core principle in logic and debate.

Occam’s Razor and Simpler Explanations

Okay, quick digression here — but it's relevant.

Ever heard of Occam’s Razor? It’s the idea that the simplest explanation is usually the right one. Atheists sometimes invoke this to say that adding a divine being to explain the universe is unnecessary.

Like, the Big Bang, natural selection, evolution — all of these work just fine without invoking a supernatural creator. So why add extra layers?

But, to be fair, theists argue the opposite: that God is the ultimate simplifier of all that complexity. Hmm. Touché.

Personal Anecdote: A Shift in Perspective

Let me throw in a story here — because theory is one thing, but real-life belief (or disbelief) is a whole other beast.

A friend of mine, Emma, grew up Catholic. Super devoted. But after studying philosophy in uni, she came across the Argument from Divine Hiddenness — it basically asks why God would stay silent if He really wanted a relationship with us. That hit her hard.

“I prayed like crazy during a rough patch in my life,” she told me. “And the silence... it felt like an answer. Or a lack of one.”

She's not angry or militant — just quietly skeptical now. That kind of transition is more common than you might think.

Final Thoughts (or, Wait, What Was the Question Again?)

So yeah, back to the original question — what’s an argument against the existence of God called?

Well, it’s an atheistic argument. But as we've seen, it's not just one thing — it's a whole toolbox full of ideas, counterpoints, and philosophical bar fights.

And here’s the thing: Whether you believe, doubt, or just enjoy the debate, these arguments tell us something deeper about how humans search for meaning. And that, honestly, might be more fascinating than the God question itself.

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.