Are Second Born Children Troublemakers? Let's Find Out!

The Myth of the "Troublemaking" Second Born

Well, if you’ve ever heard the phrase “second born children are troublemakers,” you’re not alone. I’ve heard this in countless conversations, especially among friends with more than one child. It’s almost like a stereotype that’s been passed down through generations. But is it true? Are second-born kids really more rebellious or difficult than their older siblings?

I had a recent chat with my friend Sarah, who has two kids. She jokingly referred to her second child as a "little troublemaker" and started listing all the mischief he gets into. But then, she stopped and said, “But I also wonder if he’s just… more confident.” And that got me thinking – maybe there’s more to this myth than we give credit for.

1. Birth Order Theory: Does It Actually Explain Behavior?

The Influence of Birth Order on Personality

When we talk about second-born children, we often reference birth order theory. This theory, popularized by psychologist Alfred Adler, suggests that a child’s position in the family has a significant influence on their personality. According to Adler, first-born children tend to be more responsible and authoritative, while second-borns may feel the need to compete and carve out their own identity.

Honestly, after talking to a few friends and doing some research, I found that this idea holds some truth – but not always in the way people expect. Sure, second-borns might be more independent or adventurous, but that doesn’t necessarily mean they’re troublemakers. They might just be exploring their world in different ways.

What Makes Second-Borns Unique?

As I reflected on this, I realized that second-borns often grow up in the shadow of the firstborn. They may have seen their older sibling take the first steps in everything, and now they’re eager to find their own path. Sometimes, this means they test boundaries more – which can be interpreted as mischief. But in reality, it might just be their way of asserting independence.

2. The "Troublemaker" Label: Is It Just a Misunderstanding?

Second-Borns: Risk-Takers or Rule-Breakers?

So, why do second-borns often get labeled as the "rebels" or "troublemakers"? I think part of it has to do with how society perceives them. As younger siblings, they are sometimes expected to follow in the footsteps of the firstborn. But what if they don’t want to? In many cases, second-borns might push back against family expectations or try new things just because they don’t want to be seen as "the same" as their older sibling.

Take my own experience – I’m the youngest in my family, and I distinctly remember pushing the limits, mostly out of curiosity. My older brother was pretty well-behaved, and I often found myself doing the opposite of what he did, sometimes without even realizing it. Looking back, I wouldn’t necessarily label myself a troublemaker, but I definitely did things differently.

Is Being a "Troublemaker" All That Bad?

Actually, I think a lot of this “troublemaking” is more about personality differences than anything else. Second-borns might be more willing to take risks, speak up, and explore. Sure, that can lead to some rebellious moments, but it also often leads to creativity, innovation, and resilience. Is it such a bad thing?

3. Parenting Styles: Do They Contribute to the "Troublemaker" Myth?

The Impact of Parenting on Second-Born Children

Now, here's where things get interesting. I’ve noticed, especially with my friends who have multiple children, that parents may unconsciously treat their second-borns differently. First-borns usually get more attention in their early years, simply because they’re the first ones to experience everything. By the time the second-born comes along, parents may be a little more relaxed and confident in their parenting.

This relaxed approach can sometimes give second-borns more freedom – which could explain why they’re more likely to experiment or “break the rules” in ways the first-born might not have.

Is the "Troublemaker" Label Unfair?

Honestly, I believe a lot of the troublemaker stereotype comes from how second-borns are viewed by society and their parents. Sometimes, parents expect them to be as “good” as the firstborn, and when they don’t meet those expectations, they’re labeled as rebellious. But in reality, second-borns are often just exploring their own identity and testing the waters, which is a normal part of growing up.

4. What Does Science Say About Second-Born Children?

Research on Second-Borns and Personality Traits

So, what does the research say? Studies have shown that second-borns might actually develop a sense of independence and self-confidence because they’re often trying to carve out their own place in the family. In fact, some studies even suggest that second-borns can be more creative and adaptable than their older siblings.

For instance, a study from the University of Leipzig found that second-born children were often more spontaneous and outgoing. That’s not necessarily a negative trait – it could be a sign of flexibility and a desire to stand out in a big family.

5. Conclusion: Are Second-Born Children Really Troublemakers?

Well, after all this, I’d say no – second-borns aren’t inherently troublemakers. Yes, they might take more risks and challenge authority more than their older siblings, but that’s part of being human and exploring your individuality. Instead of labeling second-borns as troublemakers, we should recognize that their behavior is often just a reflection of their unique personality and desire to differentiate themselves.

Honestly, I think the real message here is: embrace the differences. Every child, regardless of their birth order, brings something special to the table. So, the next time you hear someone say, “Oh, they’re just a second-born troublemaker,” maybe think twice and consider the bigger picture.

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.