How Did The Beatles Feel About Yoko Ono? The Truth Behind the Tension

The question of how The Beatles felt about Yoko Ono has been a subject of much debate for decades. Yoko Ono, the avant-garde artist and wife of John Lennon, became a polarizing figure within the Beatles’ inner circle. Did the band members truly dislike her, or was there more to the story? In this article, we’ll dive into the complicated relationship between Yoko Ono and The Beatles, unraveling the emotional tension, misunderstandings, and eventual peace that marked this chapter in rock history.

The Early Days: Yoko and John’s Relationship

How Yoko Ono Came Into The Picture

Yoko Ono and John Lennon’s relationship began in 1966, during the height of The Beatles' fame. Yoko, already known for her art and activism, met Lennon at an art gallery in London. Their connection was instant, but their union didn’t sit well with everyone, especially within The Beatles.

When John and Yoko became close, it was at a time when The Beatles were already under tremendous pressure. The band members were dealing with growing fame, internal conflicts, and creative differences. So, naturally, Yoko’s presence in John’s life caused friction, especially since the band’s personal relationships were tightly knit.

Was Yoko’s Influence Really the Cause of Tension?

It’s tempting to pin all the friction on Yoko herself, but the truth is more complex. I remember discussing this with my friend Mike, a huge Beatles fan. He was convinced Yoko broke the band apart, but after digging deeper, we both agreed that Yoko was more of a catalyst for existing tensions than the direct cause of the breakup. The Beatles had already been dealing with issues of control, creative freedom, and personal life for a while before Yoko entered the picture.

The Beatles’ Reactions: From Tolerance to Tension

Paul McCartney’s Strained Relationship with Yoko

Paul McCartney, in particular, had a difficult relationship with Yoko Ono. It’s well-documented that Paul was not thrilled about Yoko being in the studio during recording sessions. For Paul, Yoko’s constant presence during recording was distracting, especially as she became more involved in John’s creative process.

I’ve read several interviews where Paul admitted feeling uncomfortable with Yoko’s influence on John’s work, saying things like, “John would listen to her, and it just felt like he wasn’t the John I knew.” This sentiment caused a lot of friction between Paul and John, contributing to the growing divide within the band.

George Harrison’s Perspective: Discontent and Frustration

George Harrison, on the other hand, was even more direct about his feelings toward Yoko. In a 1970 interview, George openly criticized Yoko’s involvement in the band, claiming that her presence made it harder for him to connect with John, especially during creative sessions. He once said, “Yoko had her own ideas, and John was too into her to listen to anyone else.”

However, as the years went on, George’s frustration seemed to stem more from the overall disintegration of the band rather than just Yoko. It’s clear that George felt like his creative input was being pushed aside as John and Paul took the reins.

Yoko’s Influence: More Than Just a Band Breakup?

Yoko as an Artistic Force

Though The Beatles were initially skeptical of Yoko, it’s essential to recognize her role as an artist. She wasn’t just John’s wife, she was a respected avant-garde artist in her own right. Her influence on John was more than just emotional; it was intellectual. They collaborated on many creative projects outside of The Beatles, most notably their bed-ins for peace and their music together as John & Yoko.

Many of their projects, such as the album Unfinished Music No. 1: Two Virgins, were highly experimental and controversial, pushing the boundaries of what was considered music at the time. Yoko’s artistic vision was very much a part of John’s personal and professional life, which left the other Beatles feeling uncomfortable and unsure of how to approach her involvement.

Did Yoko Contribute to the Breakup?

It’s important to clarify that Yoko was never the sole reason for the breakup of The Beatles. In fact, the band's dissolution was a result of many complex factors, including the shifting dynamics of their personal relationships, business disagreements, and growing individual aspirations. Yoko, though often blamed, was not the singular cause of the band’s breakup. In a way, she became a symbol of the internal rifts within The Beatles, but she was not the only source of tension.

I used to believe that Yoko was the primary reason for the breakup, but after reading more about the personal struggles the band was facing, I came to understand that their issues were far more complicated. Yoko was just one part of a much larger puzzle.

Yoko’s Legacy in Beatles History

Reconciliation and Reflections

After the breakup, Yoko became a central figure in John Lennon’s post-Beatles career. He openly admitted in interviews that Yoko’s influence had brought him a sense of clarity and purpose. Over time, the relationship between Yoko and the surviving Beatles members softened. Paul McCartney, for instance, has spoken more positively about Yoko in recent years, acknowledging her role in John’s life and their creative partnership.

In fact, after Lennon’s death, Yoko continued to be involved in preserving John’s legacy, overseeing the release of his solo works and ensuring that his memory lived on through various projects.

A Shift in Public Opinion

Public opinion on Yoko has shifted over the years. While she was initially vilified as the "cause" of The Beatles’ breakup, many now recognize her as an integral part of John’s life and work. Her role in art, music, and activism is now celebrated more widely, and she is seen as a pioneer in her own right.

Conclusion: The Complex Feelings of The Beatles Toward Yoko Ono

The Beatles’ feelings toward Yoko Ono were complex and varied. While there was initial discomfort, especially from Paul and George, it would be unfair to attribute the band’s breakup solely to her presence. Yoko was a catalyst for the changes within the band, but the real reasons for their split go much deeper than just one person.

I think what’s clear is that Yoko, for all the criticism she received, played a pivotal role in John’s life. She was an artistic partner, a muse, and someone who helped him navigate his post-Beatles journey. The Beatles, though, were each on their own path, and that’s what ultimately led to their separation.

So, what do you think? Do you still feel like Yoko was the cause of the breakup, or have you come to see her influence in a different light over the years?

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.