Is FBS or FCS Better? The Real Difference That Matters

Wait—what even is the difference between FBS and FCS?

Okay, let’s just clear the air here. I used to think FBS and FCS were basically the same, just some technical NCAA thing. Like Coke vs. Diet Coke. But no—it’s a real split, and it seriously affects scholarships, media coverage, and even draft chances.

Here’s the simple version:

• FBS (Football Bowl Subdivision) = the “big boys.” Think Alabama, Ohio State, Georgia.

• FCS (Football Championship Subdivision) = still Division I, just... not the same spotlight. Think North Dakota State, Montana, Jackson State.

So, yeah, they’re both Division I football, but one plays for bowl games, and the other fights through an actual playoff system. Wild, right?

Exposure and money: FBS wins, hands down

TV deals, sold-out stadiums, and way more eyeballs

Honestly, if we’re talking pure visibility, it’s not even close. FBS programs are on ESPN, CBS, FOX, you name it. Saturday night lights, baby.

Back in college, my roommate Aaron and I used to make nachos and watch Michigan games like it was a national holiday. I don’t even remember seeing an FCS game unless it was the playoffs.

FBS schools bring in tens of millions in revenue. Bigger stadiums, more merch, bigger boosters. It’s a machine.

FCS? Way more modest. Passionate fans for sure (some of the most loyal I’ve ever met), but smaller crowds, and fewer primetime games.

Scholarships and re who gives more?

Spoiler: it’s all about numbers

Let’s talk scholarships, because this is where it really hits home for student-athletes.

• FBS programs can offer 85 full scholarships.

• FCS programs get 63 scholarships, and they can split them up (so partials are a thing there).

That’s a huge deal. My cousin Marcus played safety at a solid FCS school, and he only got a 60% scholarship. He still had to work part-time at the campus gym to cover the rest. Meanwhile, his high school buddy at a mid-tier FBS school? Full ride, meals, gear, and a little stipend.

Also, FBS schools usually have better training facilities, travel budgets, and coaching salaries. That stuff adds up.

But wait—FCS isn’t just “less than”

The FCS playoff system is actually kinda awesome

I’ll be honest—I love the FCS playoffs. While FBS is stuck with bowl politics and a 4-team (okay, now 12-team soon) CFP drama, FCS has a legit 24-team bracket. It feels earned.

You lose once in November? You're still alive. Upsets? Oh yeah, they happen. The energy is different. It’s not just about ranking and “strength of schedule,” it’s about winning and surviving. I respect that.

Plus, schools like North Dakota State have dominated with NFL-ready talent. (Carson Wentz, anyone?) Don’t sleep on FCS. It’s raw, gritty, and way less corporate.

NFL prospects: Does FBS really help?

It depends... but yeah, it helps

Here’s the truth: NFL scouts watch both levels, but FBS players get way more exposure. Combine invites, Senior Bowl invites, etc.—they tend to lean FBS-heavy.

I talked to my buddy Jalen (he works in a sports agency now), and he said: “FBS guys just get more film watched, period. Doesn't mean FCS dudes aren't good—it’s just math.”

That said, plenty of FCS players make it to the league. They just have to fight a little harder to be noticed. And honestly? Some NFL teams love that underdog grit.

So… is FBS or FCS better? Depends what you mean by “better”

If we’re being real:

• Want exposure, top-tier facilities, full rides, and big crowds? FBS.

• Want a tighter community, real playoffs, and maybe a better shot to actually play early? FCS.

It’s not that one is better overall—it’s that they offer different experiences.

If I had to choose? Eh… I used to be all-in on FBS, but the more I watch FCS playoffs, the more I respect that level. And yeah, maybe I’m just tired of the SEC taking over everything.

So, what about you? Would you rather be a backup on a powerhouse FBS team—or a starter leading an FCS squad deep into the playoffs? That’s the real question. Let me know, I’m curious how people see this stuff now.

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.