Were the French Bad in WW2? Let’s Break the Myth

Oh man, this is one of those topics that sparks debates every time! You’ve probably heard jokes or throwaway comments like “the French just surrendered in World War II,” right? But wait — is that fair? Were the French really “bad” in WW2, or is there way more to the story? Let’s dive into this together, and I promise: it’s not as black-and-white as people make it sound.
The Fall of France in 1940: What Really Happened?
Blitzkrieg Shock and Awe
In May 1940, Germany launched its infamous Blitzkrieg (lightning war) against France. Within just six weeks, France collapsed. That’s where a lot of the “bad” reputation comes from — people see the timeline and think, “Wow, they gave up fast.”
But honestly, you’ve got to understand: Germany’s military strategy was revolutionary. I was just talking to my buddy Alex last week, and he reminded me of how the French (and even the British) were still preparing for a WWI-style war — trench warfare, static defense — while the Germans were innovating with tanks, aircraft, and fast movement. It wasn’t just about bravery or willpower; it was about being outplayed strategically.
France Was Not Alone in Struggling
Let’s not forget: the British were forced off the continent at Dunkirk, barely escaping total disaster. The whole Allied front was crumbling, not just the French side. So was it really fair to single them out?
The French Resistance: Heroes in the Shadows
Underground Fighters
Even after the official surrender, many French people didn’t just sit back. The French Resistance — made up of ordinary citizens, former soldiers, and political activists — launched sabotage missions, gathered intelligence for the Allies, and helped downed pilots escape. Honestly, when you read about these stories, it’s impossible not to feel a rush of admiration.
I remember once reading about Lucie Aubrac, a schoolteacher who helped free her husband from Gestapo captivity. The courage it took to stand up against Nazi occupation, knowing you risked torture or death, is just mind-blowing.
Collaboration vs. Resistance
Now, I won’t lie — there were collaborators in France, too. The Vichy regime actively cooperated with Nazi Germany, and some French citizens went along. But that’s the messy reality of occupation: some resist, some comply, and some try to survive however they can. Labeling the whole country as “bad” completely ignores the nuance.
Military Contributions: Did France Do Anything After 1940?
Free French Forces
Under Charles de Gaulle, the Free French Forces regrouped outside of France, fighting alongside the British and Americans in campaigns across North Africa, Italy, and even the liberation of France itself in 1944. French pilots, soldiers, and sailors fought hard to reclaim their country.
Actually, funny story — I used to think the Normandy invasion was mostly Americans and British, but when I double-checked, I realized French commandos played a key role on D-Day too. I had underestimated their involvement — mistake noted!
French Colonies’ Role
Also, let’s not forget the French colonial troops. Soldiers from Africa, Indochina, and other French territories fought and died in Europe’s war. Their sacrifices are often left out of the conversation, but they were critical to the Allied war effort.
Why Does the “French Were Bad” Myth Stick?
Easy Punchline, Hard Truth
I think part of it is just how history is taught (or, honestly, not taught well). People love simple narratives — “The French surrendered” becomes an easy punchline, while the actual complicated, painful history gets flattened. Add in cultural stereotypes and wartime propaganda, and voilà: a persistent myth.
Self-Doubt Within France
Interestingly, some of the harshest criticism comes from within France itself. The post-war period was marked by national soul-searching: Why did we fall so fast? How could we let collaboration happen? This internal reckoning sometimes gets misunderstood externally as confirmation that France was “bad” in the war.
Conclusion: Let’s Get Real About WW2 France
So, were the French “bad” in World War II? Nope, not in any simple sense. They were caught off guard by a devastating enemy, they suffered a brutal occupation, and yet many of them fought back in ways that shaped the outcome of the war. Sure, mistakes were made (by every Allied country, honestly), but reducing France’s role to a single stereotype is just lazy.
If anything, the French story in WW2 is one of tragedy, resilience, and redemption — not cowardice or failure.
What do you think? Have you heard different versions of this history? I’d love to know if you, like me, had misconceptions about this topic. Maybe next time we grab coffee, we can dive even deeper — I’ve still got so many war history rabbit holes I’m curious about!
How much height should a boy have to look attractive?
Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.
Is 172 cm good for a man?
Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.
Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?
The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.
Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?
How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).
How tall is a average 15 year old?
Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years) | ||
---|---|---|
14 Years | 112.0 lb. (50.8 kg) | 64.5" (163.8 cm) |
15 Years | 123.5 lb. (56.02 kg) | 67.0" (170.1 cm) |
16 Years | 134.0 lb. (60.78 kg) | 68.3" (173.4 cm) |
17 Years | 142.0 lb. (64.41 kg) | 69.0" (175.2 cm) |
How to get taller at 18?
Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.
Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?
Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).
Can you grow between 16 and 18?
Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.
Can you grow 1 cm after 17?
Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.