What Did the First Humans Eat? The Fascinating Origins of Our Diet

Honestly, when you think about the first humans, what comes to mind? The cavemen? The hunter-gatherers out there, roaming the wild, trying to survive? Yeah, that's basically what it was like. But have you ever wondered—what did the first humans actually eat? Like, for real? No, I'm not talking about the pizza you devoured last night (though, I wish). I'm talking about the first meals of humankind, when we were all just figuring out how to stay alive.

I’ve always found this subject pretty fascinating, and I know I’m not the only one. I was talking with a friend of mine the other day (let's call him Jake), and we got into a pretty heated discussion about the evolution of food. He was convinced that humans were mostly vegetarians at first (who even knows why, right?), while I thought meat had to be in the picture from the beginning. I’ll tell you what I found out – and spoiler alert, it’s actually a bit more complicated than we might think.

1. The Basics of the Early Human Diet: Hunter-Gatherers

Well, first things first, humans didn’t just sit around waiting for delivery. They had to hunt and gather their food just to survive. The first humans were most likely omnivores, eating whatever they could find. It wasn’t all about following the food pyramid—there was no such thing as a healthy eating plan back then. They ate what was available based on their environment, which included fruits, nuts, roots, and, of course, animals.

From what I’ve read, the earliest humans, especially Homo habilis (about 2.4 million years ago), relied heavily on plant-based foods. They were foraging for berries, tubers, and leaves, just like other primates. And you know what? I kinda get it—plants are easy to grab, and they don’t fight back. (Though, I doubt they had avocado toast on their mind, haha.)

2. Meat in the Early Human Diet: A Game Changer

But here's where it gets interesting. Actually, if we’re being honest, the big shift probably came when humans started to consume more animal protein. This transition was crucial for survival and development. In fact, archaeological evidence suggests that early humans were not just gathering plants—they were also hunting animals. This didn’t mean they were out there hunting down massive mammoths all the time (though that would’ve been awesome to witness), but they did hunt smaller game like antelopes and rabbits.

I remember reading a study once that suggested early humans weren’t just scavengers, they were also active hunters. They used tools, likely made from stone, to bring down prey, which gave them access to a new source of nutrition—animal fat and protein. And honestly, that’s where things started to change. We’ve all heard how important protein is, right? Well, early humans needed it to fuel their growing brains.

3. Cooking: The Secret Weapon of Early Humans

Now, let’s talk about fire, because wow, fire changed everything. Once humans learned to control fire, they could cook their food. This wasn’t just about making things taste better (though I’m sure that helped), it was about making food easier to digest and more nutritious. Early humans, who were probably eating raw meat and plants, could now unlock more calories from their food.

I’ve read somewhere that cooking food made it easier for the body to absorb the nutrients, particularly from things like meat and starches. So, cooking food likely played a huge role in making our brains grow larger. And you know what? I kinda feel like that’s the moment we became humans, in a way—taking control of our environment and figuring out how to make the most out of what we had.

4. Were the First Humans Really Vegetarians?

Okay, let’s talk about that theory I mentioned earlier. Some believe that early humans were more vegetarian than we think, but that idea doesn’t hold up when we look at the evidence. Sure, there was a lot of plant-eating going on, but most anthropologists agree that early humans ate a balanced diet of both plants and animals. Even if they did consume a lot of plant-based foods, there’s no way around the fact that meat consumption was critical to their development.

Honestly, though, I think the “veg-only” theory came up because people want to imagine that we were all peaceful, plant-loving beings from the start. But life in the wild doesn’t work like that. Humans had to be opportunistic and eat whatever they could get their hands on. It’s not like they had a weekly meal plan, after all.

5. How Did Early Humans Actually Eat?

So, how did they do it? Well, they didn’t exactly sit down at a table like we do. Instead, early humans likely ate their meals on the go or in small groups, sharing whatever they managed to hunt or gather that day. It wasn’t all organized or pretty, I imagine.

A fun little side note—early humans probably ate together around campfires (just like in those old documentaries), and some anthropologists think that sharing food helped build social bonds. Imagine sitting around with your fellow cave people, tossing a chunk of roasted meat around. I’m sure that fostered some strong friendships. 😄

Conclusion: A Complex, Evolving Diet

To wrap this up: the first humans ate whatever they could find—plants, small animals, and whatever else they could scavenge or hunt. Over time, though, as they evolved and figured out fire, they started eating more meat, which likely fueled the growth of their brains and the development of modern human societies.

So, what does this all mean for you? Well, it’s clear that diversity in diet was essential for early humans. They ate a mix of plant-based foods and animal products, and both were key to survival. If you’ve ever wondered if you could live like a true “caveman,” the reality is, you'd need to balance both sides—meat, plants, and a bit of fire to cook it all.

Next time you’re cooking your dinner, remember: You’re eating just a slightly evolved version of what the first humans enjoyed (except hopefully, without the raw meat). 🥩🍠

So, what do you think? Does that change your view on how we came to be where we are today?

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.