Who is the Least Hated Team in the NFL? Find Out Now!

The Nature of NFL Rivalries
Well, if you’re a football fan, you know how intense NFL rivalries can be. There’s something about the game that brings out passionate emotions, from victory celebrations to deep frustration when your team loses. But here's the thing—there’s always that one team that, for reasons I’m still trying to figure out, is just… well, loved, or at least not hated as much as the rest. It's like, no matter who you support, you can't help but feel a little bit of respect for them.
Honestly, I was chatting with my buddy Chris the other day about this, and we couldn’t come to a clear answer. But after digging deeper into the history of NFL teams and their fanbases, a few teams stood out as being the least hated—or at least the most "neutral." So, let’s dive into it.
The Case for the Green Bay Packers
The Charm of the Packers' Legacy
Okay, let’s start with a team that’s been around for ages: the Green Bay Packers. They’re often considered one of the least hated teams in the NFL, and honestly, it makes sense. The Packers have this charming underdog vibe, especially since they play in a small market (Green Bay isn’t exactly a bustling metropolis). The fanbase is incredibly loyal and passionate, but the team doesn’t carry the kind of baggage that other teams might have.
I think it’s also because they’re traditionally very community-focused. Remember the famous “Titletown” moniker? It’s like the Packers have this humble, yet historic aura around them. When you think of them, you don’t immediately think of drama or controversies (well, except for maybe the Brett Favre retirement saga). But overall, they keep it pretty respectful, and I think that plays a huge part in their general likability.
A Team that "Doesn't Rock the Boat"
One thing I’ve noticed with Green Bay is that they don’t seem to stir the pot much. They have a solid fan base, and their rivalries with teams like the Chicago Bears or Minnesota Vikings are intense, but there’s no major bad blood with the general NFL audience. Fans of other teams may dislike them, but it's more out of competition, not hatred.
The Minnesota Vikings: A Surprisingly Neutral Team
The Midwestern Appeal
Honestly, this one caught me off guard. I always thought the Vikings might be more polarizing, but the more I looked into it, the more I realized they don’t really ruffle many feathers. Maybe it's because Minnesota, in general, doesn’t seem to have the same heated rivalries that other teams have. While they do have rivalries with teams like the Packers and the Bears, the Vikings are kind of like that middle-of-the-road team that people don’t really have strong feelings about.
I was talking to my friend Emma, who’s a die-hard Vikings fan, and she pointed out something interesting. Despite the occasional heartbreak (like their devastating playoff losses), the team has a reputation for being resilient and respectable. They’re not known for excessive drama or scandals—so even when they’re not winning, there’s this level of admiration for their perseverance. That’s pretty rare in the NFL, to be honest.
Why They're Not Hated
Unlike teams with bigger-than-life personalities like the Dallas Cowboys or New England Patriots, the Vikings stay relatively low-key. They don’t make a lot of noise, and while they have passionate fans, they don't inspire the same kind of hatred that teams with flashy reputations or controversial figures do. It's almost as if the Vikings fly under the radar in terms of rivalry hate, and that’s probably why they’re one of the least hated teams in the NFL.
The San Diego Chargers (Now Los Angeles Chargers)
Moving to LA: A Fresh Start?
Okay, this one is a bit of an anomaly. The Chargers, originally from San Diego, never really had a massive "hated" following, especially when compared to teams like the Raiders or the Cowboys. The Chargers had a loyal fan base in San Diego, and while there was some mild rivalry with teams like the Oakland Raiders, they never became a team that evoked intense dislike across the league.
The whole move to Los Angeles, however, has been a bit controversial, with some fans still upset about the relocation. But surprisingly, the Chargers haven’t picked up the kind of animosity that you might expect from a team that relocates. Honestly, I think it’s because they’ve always had a relatively chill vibe, and they haven’t dominated the league enough to be seen as a "villain."
Why Are They Hard to Hate?
It’s kind of like the Chargers have this perpetual underdog energy. Sure, they’ve had some playoff heartbreaks, but they’ve never been the team that others focus all their hate on. They’re not the Patriots or the Cowboys, and they certainly don’t carry the baggage of a team like the Raiders. Maybe it’s because they don’t really stand out in a way that fuels hatred—they’re not obnoxiously successful, but they’re also not the bottom of the barrel. And maybe that’s why, despite their ups and downs, the Chargers aren’t on anyone’s "most hated" list.
The Final Verdict: It’s About Respect, Not Rivalry
Well, after looking at these teams, I’d say the Green Bay Packers come out on top as the least hated team in the NFL. They’re just universally respected for their history, humble beginnings, and community-based culture. But hey, that’s just my opinion. The Minnesota Vikings and the Chargers are also pretty neutral teams in terms of league-wide hatred. It all comes down to how these teams carry themselves both on and off the field.
If you’re a fan of any of these teams, you probably know that they may not have the spotlight of the most hated teams, but they’ve built a reputation of being solid, respectable franchises. Honestly, I think that’s what makes them so intriguing—no huge drama, no massive egos, just a love for the game.
How much height should a boy have to look attractive?
Well, fellas, worry no more, because a new study has revealed 5ft 8in is the ideal height for a man. Dating app Badoo has revealed the most right-swiped heights based on their users aged 18 to 30.
Is 172 cm good for a man?
Yes it is. Average height of male in India is 166.3 cm (i.e. 5 ft 5.5 inches) while for female it is 152.6 cm (i.e. 5 ft) approximately. So, as far as your question is concerned, aforesaid height is above average in both cases.
Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?
The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.
Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?
How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).
How tall is a average 15 year old?
Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years
Male Teens: 13 - 20 Years) | ||
---|---|---|
14 Years | 112.0 lb. (50.8 kg) | 64.5" (163.8 cm) |
15 Years | 123.5 lb. (56.02 kg) | 67.0" (170.1 cm) |
16 Years | 134.0 lb. (60.78 kg) | 68.3" (173.4 cm) |
17 Years | 142.0 lb. (64.41 kg) | 69.0" (175.2 cm) |
How to get taller at 18?
Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.
Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?
Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).
Can you grow between 16 and 18?
Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.
Can you grow 1 cm after 17?
Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.