Who Owns the Most Tennis Titles? The Real Champion Revealed

The king of all-time titles: more than just Grand Slams

Let’s clear one thing up first — Grand Slam titles are not everything. Yeah, they matter a lot. They’re iconic. But if you’re asking who owns the most tennis titles overall, you’ve got to look beyond just the Australian Open, Roland-Garros, Wimbledon, and the US Open.

And here’s the big reveal: the man with the most ATP titles ever is Jimmy Connors, with 109 singles titles.

Surprised? So was I. I used to think it had to be Djokovic or Federer. But nope — Connors ruled the tour in the '70s and '80s like a machine. He played everywhere, won everywhere, and yeah, sometimes people say he chased the "smaller" tournaments. But honestly? A title is a title.

Why Jimmy Connors still holds the crown

Insane consistency across decades

Connors turned pro in 1972. And he kept winning well into the '90s. He was a grinder, tough as nails, and kind of a rebel. I remember watching some old matches with my dad — Connors yelling, fists pumping, diving on hard courts like a madman. You don’t forget that energy.

And look, the guy won eight Grand Slams, which is no joke. But those other 101 titles? They show a ridiculous level of dominance week after week.

Not just a numbers game

He also holds the record for most matches won in ATP history — over 1,200. That’s not just talent. That’s obsession, durability, and probably a bit of stubbornness.

And okay, yeah, some say his record is padded by smaller tournaments. But tell me this: would you win 109 titles in anything? I can’t even win three games in a row in Mario Kart.

What about Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic?

Federer: The elegance and 103 titles

Federer isn’t far behind — 103 ATP titles, including 20 Grand Slams. For a long time, I thought he’d catch Connors. He had that perfect mix: class, talent, timing. But his later years were tougher, injuries piled up… and then time just caught up. Still, 103 is massive.

I remember betting with my colleague Sarah (huge Fed fan) back in 2018 that he’d beat Connors’ record. I lost a lunch over that one.

Nadal: Dominance on clay, 92 titles

Nadal’s at 92 titles, which is insane considering how physical his game is. And with 14 Roland-Garros wins, he’s the king of clay forever. But the injuries… ugh. They really slowed his march toward the all-time record.

Still, if we were counting sweat and heart, he’d be way ahead.

Djokovic: The Slam leader

Now here’s the twist. Novak Djokovic has more Grand Slams than any man in history (24 and counting). But in total titles? He’s just above 95. So not quite Connors-level yet.

Funny thing — I used to think that if Djokovic broke the Slam record, he'd automatically be the GOAT. But now I’m not so sure. Titles are just one lens. The debate's messier than it looks.

What about the women’s side?

Martina Navratilova: Absolute legend with 167 titles

Yeah, forget Connors for a second. Martina Navratilova has the real flex: 167 singles titles. Not even counting doubles. I mean — how is that even real?

She played forever. Dominated in singles, then crushed it in doubles too. If we’re talking pure quantity of victories, she’s arguably the most accomplished player ever.

My cousin Lina — a former club player — used to have a Martina poster in her kitchen. She said it was to “remind me that hard work beats whining.” I still think about that when I want to skip the gym.

Final thoughts: So, who’s really the greatest?

Depends how you look at it.

• Most ATP titles? Jimmy Connors, 109.

• Most Grand Slams? Novak Djokovic, 24.

• Most singles titles ever (men or women)? Martina Navratilova, 167.

So when someone asks “who owns the most tennis titles?” — you kinda have to ask:
“Which titles? Singles? Doubles? Slams? All-time? Active?”

And honestly, I used to think numbers told the whole story. Now? I think greatness is also about legacy, impact, love of the game.

But yeah — Connors owns the most ATP titles. That’s just a fact. Like it or not.

And I respect the hell out of it.

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.