Why Does Marxism Hate Capitalism?

I remember the first real debate I had about capitalism and Marxism. It was in a dimly lit pub, the kind where the walls are covered in posters of Che Guevara, old labor union slogans, and indie band stickers. We had just finished a lecture on Karl Marx in university, and naturally, a few of us were deep into pints, arguing about whether capitalism was the greatest system ever invented or just a giant con job.

One guy—let’s call him Jake—was passionately defending free markets, rattling off how capitalism had lifted millions out of poverty. Then there was Maria, a staunch leftist, shaking her head in frustration. “Capitalism exploits workers. That’s its whole point,” she said, slamming her glass down for emphasis.

And that’s when it hit me: Marxism doesn’t just criticize capitalism. It fundamentally hates it. But why?

The Core of Marxist Hatred for Capitalism

Marxism’s beef with capitalism isn’t just about wealth inequality or greedy corporations. It’s deeper than that. At its core, Marxism sees capitalism as an unfair, exploitative system that keeps the majority in perpetual struggle while a small elite thrives.

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels laid it all out in The Communist Manifesto (1848). They argued that capitalism does two things:

1. Creates a class struggle between the rich (bourgeoisie) and the working class (proletariat).
2. Concentrates wealth and power into fewer and fewer hands.

Marx saw history as a cycle of class conflict, and to him, capitalism was just another step in that process—one that would eventually collapse under its own contradictions.

The Exploitation Factor: Where Marxists Lose Their Patience

One of the strongest Marxist critiques is the idea of surplus value. This was something Maria passionately explained that night at the bar.

“Think about it,” she said. “A worker makes a pair of shoes in a factory. The shoes sell for $100. But the worker only gets paid $20. Where does the rest go?”

Jake shrugged. “To the business, obviously. Profit.”

“Exactly!” Maria exclaimed. “The worker does all the labor, but the capitalist pockets most of the value. That’s what Marx called exploitation.”

And this is where Marxists really get fired up. To them, capitalism doesn’t just generate wealth—it steals it from the workers. The argument is that workers create everything, but they don’t own anything. Instead, the factory owner, the CEO, the investors—they get the real rewards.

Boom and Bust: The System’s Supposed “Built-In” Failure

Another thing that fuels Marxist hatred for capitalism is its instability. Anyone who’s lived through a financial crisis knows how wild capitalism can be. From the Great Depression of 1929 to the 2008 financial meltdown, capitalism seems to go through booms and crashes like a rollercoaster.

I remember when the 2008 crisis hit. My uncle lost his job overnight. One day he was a proud factory worker; the next, he was filling out unemployment forms. The worst part? The bankers who had caused the mess got bailed out, while ordinary people lost their homes. It felt like a rigged game.

Marxists argue that capitalism naturally leads to crises because of overproduction and speculation. In their view, businesses produce more than people can afford to buy, leading to layoffs, recessions, and economic crashes. Marx called this the contradictions of capitalism—a system that creates wealth but also massive instability.

The Illusion of Freedom: Are We Really Free?

One of the most interesting conversations I’ve had about this was with an old friend who spent years working in retail. He told me, “People always say capitalism is about freedom. But what kind of freedom is it when your only choice is to work for someone else or starve?”

That’s a classic Marxist critique. Capitalism sells itself as a system of freedom, but Marxists argue it’s actually a form of wage slavery. Sure, you can choose your job—but you can’t choose not to work unless you’re already rich.

Marx believed that real freedom could only come when the workers controlled the means of production—factories, land, businesses—instead of a small group of wealthy elites.

The Debate That Never Ends

Of course, not everyone buys into the Marxist perspective. That night in the bar, Jake fired back with a classic counterargument:

“Look, I get it. Capitalism isn’t perfect. But it’s better than the alternatives. Just look at the Soviet Union—Marxist ideas in action, and it was a disaster.”

And he had a point. Every attempt at creating a fully Marxist society has struggled, from the USSR’s economic collapse to Venezuela’s crisis. Capitalism, for all its flaws, has driven innovation, lifted millions out of poverty, and created technological progress.

But then Maria smirked. “Or maybe capitalism just hasn’t failed yet. Every empire collapses eventually.”

That’s the thing about this debate—it never has a neat ending. Marxists see capitalism as a temporary phase in history, one that will eventually be replaced. Capitalists argue that no better system has ever been invented. And in between, most of us just try to get by, hoping we don’t get crushed in the next economic crisis.

My Take: A Love-Hate Relationship

Personally, I find myself torn between the two sides. I see the efficiency and innovation capitalism brings, but I also get why so many people feel like it’s a rigged system. Marxism’s critique of exploitation, inequality, and instability isn’t wrong—it’s just that nobody has really cracked the code on what comes next.

So, why does Marxism hate capitalism? Because it sees it as fundamentally unfair, exploitative, and doomed to fail. But whether that’s true or just wishful thinking from those who dream of a different world—that’s a question that will probably be debated in bars, universities, and political circles for decades to come.

And if history has taught us anything, it’s that neither capitalism nor Marxism is going away anytime soon.

What do you think? Is capitalism the best we’ve got, or is there something better waiting down the road?

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.