Why is it NC-17 and Not 18: Uncovering the Mystery Behind the Movie Rating System?

Why is it NC-17 and not 18? The Mystery Behind the Rating System

Understanding the NC-17 Rating

Well, if you've ever stumbled upon the NC-17 rating while browsing movie options, you’ve probably asked yourself, "Why NC-17 and not 18?" Honestly, it’s a fair question, because when you think of movies with explicit content or extreme themes, 18 seems like a more logical choice, right? But the NC-17 rating, while it certainly points to mature content, has a history and system behind it that doesn’t quite align with the simple 18+. So, why is it NC-17?

I had a chat with a friend of mine who’s obsessed with movie ratings and the psychology behind them, and we got into this exact debate. The deeper I dove into the history of movie ratings in the U.S., the more I understood why “NC-17” made more sense than just slapping an “18” label on films.

The History of the NC-17 Rating

The Birth of NC-17

Honestly, the origin of the NC-17 rating is somewhat tied to controversy. The MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America) introduced it in 1990 as a way to better define the difference between R-rated movies and those with explicit content that wasn’t suitable for a general audience. Before NC-17, films with adult content were either rated X or R. The problem? The X rating was often associated with pornographic films, even though many movies that dealt with mature themes (like Midnight Cowboy) had an X rating but weren’t adult films in the traditional sense.

So, the MPAA created NC-17 to give a clear, distinct rating to films that were still considered too explicit for mainstream audiences but weren’t in the same category as porn. It was their way of saying, “This film is adult, but not that adult.”

Why Not Just 18?

Okay, so why not just use 18+ or something simpler? The NC-17 rating was specifically chosen because of its historical connotations with more nuanced adult content, not just raw explicitness. When you use “18” or “18+,” it often implies something more standardized and broad, which is closer to what we see with movie ratings in countries like the UK (where “18” is used across many films that deal with adult themes).

But the NC-17 rating has the weight of being a specialized, less common rating in the U.S. movie industry, marking the line between serious adult cinema and adult content designed to titillate or entertain in a less "artistic" way. Think about it—NC-17 films are often a more artistic or dramatic take on mature content, which helps maintain the integrity of a film even with explicit themes.

The Real-World Impact of NC-17

The Box Office Struggles

Here’s something you probably didn’t know: movies with an NC-17 rating generally struggle at the box office. I was talking with a filmmaker friend recently about how NC-17 movies tend to be avoided by mainstream theaters. In fact, many movie theaters refuse to show NC-17 films, and the distribution can be incredibly limited. The stigma around the NC-17 rating is real—it’s like a badge that automatically says “don’t bother with this unless you’re truly looking for something edgy or avant-garde.”

This is one of the main reasons filmmakers often try to get an R rating instead. A filmmaker might try to cut down content just enough to drop the rating from NC-17 to R because an NC-17 label reduces the potential audience and seriously hurts a movie’s commercial success.

Cultural Connotations of the NC-17 Rating

Mouais, the NC-17 rating also carries a certain cultural weight. It’s associated with more “serious” adult content, often with deeper themes about sex, relationships, and human experiences. This can be seen in movies like Showgirls (1995), which was a huge critical and commercial flop, or The Dreamers (2003), which had an NC-17 rating due to explicit sexual content but was a more critically received film. The stigma, however, remains.

The "18+" label, on the other hand, might be too general or associated with straightforward, non-artistic adult material. The NC-17 was an attempt to carve out a niche for movies that want to explore serious, explicit themes while still being seen as artistic or culturally important.

Why NC-17 Can Be Seen as More Restrictive Than 18+

The Audience Split

One thing I’ve realized from chatting with people who know the industry better is that the NC-17 rating can be more restrictive than the 18+ label simply because of how it is viewed. If something is rated NC-17, it often implies that the movie is "too much" for mainstream audiences, yet it’s not necessarily "bad" or "trash" as some might assume. The strictness with NC-17 films, in a way, makes them more niche, while 18+ just gives a general “adult” classification.

Honestly, though, I wonder if that’s part of the reason why some films have avoided this rating altogether. The fact that NC-17 can be linked to films that are not commercially viable has led to it being a label that filmmakers and studios tend to avoid for financial reasons.

Conclusion: NC-17 vs. 18 — The Final Word

Actually, after diving into this, I think I get it now. The reason we have NC-17 instead of just using "18+" is about creating a distinction. The NC-17 rating is more nuanced and has historical connotations, while "18+" is just a blanket term used across the world. The MPAA created NC-17 to separate artistic, explicit content from what’s considered outright adult content, thus maintaining a level of integrity.

So, next time you’re browsing through movies, you’ll know that the NC-17 rating isn't just a random number—it’s a carefully considered system that defines the nature of adult content in film. And who knows, you might even start to see it differently the next time you spot it on a movie poster!

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.