Would Diana Have Become Queen? The Truth Behind the Royal Title

Diana’s Path to the Throne: Would She Have Ever Been Queen?

The question of whether Princess Diana would have become queen is one that has sparked countless debates. It's a topic that ignites emotions and imaginations alike—mainly because it taps into the "what ifs" of history. You may have heard people say, “If Diana and Charles had stayed together…” or “She could have been queen if...” But the reality of the situation is a little more complex than we like to admit. So, would Diana have become Queen of England? Let's dig into it.

Diana’s Position at the Time of Her Marriage

When Diana married Prince Charles in 1981, the odds were heavily stacked against her ever becoming Queen. Not because of her popularity—far from it! Diana had an immense public following. But the monarchy has a very clear line of succession, and Diana wasn’t anywhere near the top of it. The line to the throne is through blood, and since she was married to Charles, who is second in line, Diana’s role was that of a consort, not a ruler.

However, people often mistake her position for something more royal than it truly was. Diana wasn’t in direct line to the throne; she was, in a sense, the partner of the future king, which made her a "princess" rather than a queen by birthright.

Could Diana Have Become Queen if She Stayed with Charles?

Here’s the burning question: if Diana had stayed married to Charles, would she have eventually become queen? On paper, no. Charles is still the heir apparent, and if he had ascended to the throne, Diana would have been his consort. She would have been known as Queen Consort, not queen in her own right. The difference is subtle, but important—queen consort is a ceremonial title, given to the wife of a reigning king.

But there’s a catch. Diana’s potential to wield influence would have been immense, even if she was never officially crowned. She was already a figure of tremendous significance in the royal family, beloved by the public and constantly in the spotlight. If the monarchy had allowed her to thrive in this role, she could have become a kind of unofficial queen, someone with extraordinary influence over royal matters.

The Divorce: A Turning Point in Diana’s Royal Status

And then, of course, came the divorce. In 1996, Diana and Charles officially separated, and their divorce was finalized in 1997. This changed everything. Without her marriage to Charles, Diana lost her official title as Princess of Wales, and any further speculation about her becoming Queen consort vanished.

But here's where things get tricky—Diana still held the title of "Princess of Wales" after the divorce. Though she wasn't technically in line for the throne anymore, she still had royal status and was regarded as part of the royal family. This status would remain with her, whether or not she was ever going to be queen.

What Would Have Happened if Diana Had Remarried?

I had a conversation with a friend the other day about this—what if Diana had remarried? Would that have changed her position in the royal family? The truth is, even if Diana had remarried someone else, her chances of becoming queen were still slim. The British monarchy doesn’t change its structure just because a royal figure falls in love again. But, if she had married someone with royal blood, say, a European prince, then perhaps the scenario could have shifted.

Diana, in that case, could have been called a queen consort in a different context. But, let's be real for a moment—Diana wasn’t someone who played by the rules of tradition. She had a huge global following and was constantly breaking barriers. So, even as a divorced mother, she still had a level of influence that no other royal consort had ever had before.

Diana's Legacy: Was She a Queen in the Hearts of the People?

Even though Diana never wore a crown, she was a queen in the hearts of millions. Her influence, compassion, and elegance made her beloved worldwide, and in many ways, she held more sway than any official royal title ever could.

Her charitable work, especially with AIDS patients and landmine victims, positioned her as a leader in ways that some of the royals couldn't match. If you ask me, she would’ve made a fantastic queen, not just because of her popularity but because of her ability to connect with people. She would have brought a different energy to the monarchy, perhaps modernizing it in ways no one had imagined.

Would Diana Have Ever Ruled? Probably Not, but She Did Lead

Let’s be honest. Diana wouldn’t have become queen in the traditional sense—she was never in line for the throne, and even if she had stayed married to Charles, she would have had the title of queen consort, not a ruling monarch. But in terms of influence, leadership, and legacy, Diana was a queen in her own right. Her untimely death left an irreplaceable void in the royal family, one that Charles and his successors will never fully fill.

I’ve often thought about this: If Diana had lived longer, how would the monarchy have changed? Would she have had a more substantial role in shaping royal politics? Would the public have pushed for her to have more power? It's all speculation now, but it’s hard not to wonder.

Conclusion: Diana, Queen of Hearts, But Not the Throne

So, would Diana have been queen? Technically, no—she was never in line for the throne, and even as the wife of the future king, her role would have been consort. But Diana's impact transcended any title. In the hearts of the people, she remains a queen—one whose legacy continues to shape the monarchy and the world long after her tragic passing.

It’s a question that will always spark debates and hypothetical scenarios, but the truth is, Diana was already a queen in the eyes of millions—whether she had a crown or not.

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.