What Did Aristotle Say About Plato?

What Did Aristotle Say About Plato? Uncovering Their Philosophical Relationship

The Teacher and The Student: Understanding Aristotle and Plato's Relationship

Honestly, when we think of philosophy, Plato and Aristotle are probably two of the biggest names that come to mind. Their ideas have shaped the entire Western philosophical tradition. But the relationship between these two men was complex. Plato, who was Aristotle’s teacher, left a significant impact on him, yet Aristotle did not entirely agree with many of Plato’s ideas. So, what did Aristotle really think about Plato? Let’s dig into this fascinating philosophical relationship and explore how Aristotle viewed Plato's philosophy.

Plato’s Influence on Aristotle: A Philosophical Foundation

First off, it’s important to recognize that Aristotle was profoundly influenced by Plato, especially in his early years. Aristotle studied at Plato’s Academy in Athens for about 20 years. I remember when I first learned this, I was kind of shocked—imagine spending two decades learning from someone! In that time, Aristotle absorbed Plato’s teachings, particularly those related to forms and metaphysics. However, Aristotle eventually came to disagree with his teacher, which led him to develop his own unique philosophy.

Plato’s theory of forms suggested that the physical world we see around us is just a shadow of the true reality, which exists as abstract forms in an ideal, non-physical realm. Honestly, I was fascinated by Plato's take on this when I read about it in college. It’s almost like he was saying the real world is an illusion, and the ideal world is the one that truly matters.

Aristotle’s Critique of Plato’s Forms

So, what did Aristotle think about Plato’s idea of the forms? Well, he had a lot to say about it. While he respected Plato, he didn’t completely buy into the concept of ideal forms existing separately from the material world. Aristotle thought that the forms didn’t exist in some distant realm but rather in the objects themselves. This is a crucial part of his philosophy—he believed that everything has an essence within it, and the form is not something external but something inherent in the object itself.

In his "Metaphysics", Aristotle criticized Plato’s theory, arguing that separating forms from objects led to unnecessary complexities. He believed that reality is grounded in the physical world and that knowledge comes from studying this world, rather than from contemplating ideal forms in an abstract, unreachable world.

Aristotle’s View on Plato’s Politics

Honestly, when I looked into Aristotle’s thoughts on Plato’s politics, I found it pretty fascinating. Plato, in his work "The Republic", imagined a society governed by philosopher-kings—wise rulers who would govern with rationality and virtue. While Aristotle agreed that philosophers should have influence over society, he didn’t think that a society should be ruled by philosopher-kings. He felt that Plato’s ideal state was overly utopian and unrealistic.

Aristotle proposed a more pragmatic approach in his "Politics". He believed that the best form of government was a mixed constitution, which combined elements of democracy and oligarchy. Aristotle thought that society should have a balance, where power was distributed and checks and balances were in place.

I remember debating this with a friend who’s also passionate about philosophy. We both agreed that while Plato’s vision is powerful in its idealism, Aristotle’s approach seems much more grounded in reality—perhaps because Aristotle himself was very much focused on observation and practical experience, rather than theoretical ideals.

Aristotle’s Emphasis on Empirical Knowledge vs. Plato’s Idealism

This brings us to another crucial distinction. While Plato was deeply invested in idealism, Aristotle championed empiricism—the idea that knowledge comes primarily from sensory experience. This was a significant divergence between the two. Plato believed that we could access knowledge through reason and contemplation of abstract forms, whereas Aristotle thought we must observe the world around us, study it, and gather evidence to understand reality.

In a way, this is where Aristotle’s philosophy feels much more scientific—he was interested in categorizing knowledge, studying biology, ethics, and many other fields based on observation. To give you an example, I once tried to understand Aristotle’s approach through reading his work on biology. It blew my mind—he literally classified different species based on observable traits, way ahead of his time. Plato, on the other hand, would probably have argued that understanding comes from conceptualizing perfect forms, not from getting our hands dirty in the real world.

The Legacy of Their Philosophical Conflict

At the end of the day, what did Aristotle truly think about Plato? Well, it’s clear that while Aristotle respected Plato and considered him his teacher, he didn’t always agree with him. I like to think that Aristotle took the best parts of Plato’s philosophy but wasn’t afraid to challenge him when it didn’t make sense to him. The way Aristotle went on to develop his own school of thought, the Lyceum, and his detailed work in subjects like logic, ethics, and metaphysics, shows that he wasn’t just a student—he was a revolutionary in his own right.

Conclusion: Aristotle’s Complex Relationship with Plato

Honestly, when you look at their relationship, it’s fascinating how two of the greatest minds in Western philosophy could have such differing views. Aristotle’s criticism of Plato didn’t mean he rejected everything his teacher stood for. In fact, it was Plato’s ideas that gave Aristotle the foundation to build his own philosophical empire. They had different approaches to metaphysics, politics, and knowledge, but in the end, both laid the groundwork for much of modern thought.

So, what do you think? Do you agree with Plato’s idealism or Aristotle’s empirical approach? It’s definitely a conversation worth having, and I’d love to hear your thoughts!

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.