What Did Scottie Pippen Say About LeBron?

The NBA has seen countless debates about who the greatest player of all time is. While Michael Jordan is often at the top of that list, there's a fierce rivalry between LeBron James and other legends like Scottie Pippen. Recently, Pippen made some interesting comments about LeBron that stirred up the basketball community. Let’s dive into what he said and what it means for the ongoing debate about LeBron's place in NBA history.

Scottie Pippen’s Views on LeBron James

A Different Kind of Praise?

Scottie Pippen, a six-time NBA champion with the Chicago Bulls, has always been known for his candid and sometimes controversial remarks. Pippen has been a vocal supporter of Michael Jordan for years, often defending Jordan’s legacy in comparison to other players, including LeBron. However, Pippen’s recent statements about LeBron have sparked a lot of attention.

In an interview, Pippen shared that while LeBron is an incredible player, he doesn’t think LeBron has the same "killer instinct" that Jordan had. This comment has been at the heart of the conversation. Pippen argued that LeBron's playmaking ability and willingness to pass the ball in critical moments of a game show a different mentality compared to Jordan's "takeover" style of leadership.

"LeBron is Great, But..."

Pippen didn’t downplay LeBron’s greatness. He acknowledged that LeBron has had an extraordinary career and continues to dominate the game well into his 30s. However, Pippen pointed out that LeBron’s style of leadership, while effective, is not the same as Michael Jordan’s or even Kobe Bryant's, who are often considered the "alpha dogs" of their respective teams.

What struck me about Pippen’s statement was how he compares LeBron’s approach to the game with Jordan’s. While LeBron has been criticized for sometimes passing in clutch moments, Jordan was known for taking on the challenge headfirst, regardless of the odds. For Pippen, this "alpha mentality" is a crucial factor that separates LeBron from Jordan and other greats.

Pippen's Legacy and LeBron’s Comparison

Pippen’s Role in the Bulls Dynasty

It's also worth considering Pippen’s own legacy. Pippen was always the No. 2 to Jordan’s No. 1. He was the ultimate sidekick, a fantastic defender, and a versatile player who could do it all. But, in comparison to LeBron, Pippen’s role was clear-cut — he didn’t need to be "the guy" on the court to win championships. Pippen was instrumental in Jordan’s success, but he never had to carry a team the way LeBron has.

This dynamic leads to an interesting point: Pippen's perspective is shaped by his experience playing alongside one of the most dominant players in NBA history. Perhaps his assessment of LeBron is influenced by the comparisons he’s always had to make with Jordan.

LeBron's Ability to Carry a Team

One thing that can’t be ignored is LeBron’s ability to carry teams to victory. Pippen, despite his critiques, does recognize LeBron’s value and impact on the game. LeBron has made multiple teams championship contenders and won titles with three different franchises. That's something not many players can boast, including Jordan, who stayed with the Bulls for the majority of his career.

In many ways, LeBron's influence on the court is undeniable. He's had incredible success in different systems, with different teammates, and in different eras of the NBA. Pippen, as great as he was, didn’t have to carry that kind of burden, which makes the comparison between him and LeBron interesting.

The Debate: Leadership vs. Playmaking

Leadership Styles: Jordan vs. LeBron

One of the most debated topics among NBA fans is the difference in leadership between Michael Jordan and LeBron James. Pippen’s comments add fuel to the fire of this debate. Jordan was the type of leader who led by example — demanding the best from his teammates and sometimes pushing them to the limit. LeBron, on the other hand, is known for his high basketball IQ and willingness to involve his teammates in crucial moments. Pippen’s remarks reflect this contrast.

In some ways, it feels like Pippen is emphasizing Jordan’s leadership over LeBron’s ability to make the best play. But the truth is, both approaches have worked incredibly well for their respective teams. The Bulls dynasty wouldn't have been possible without Jordan’s leadership, and LeBron’s success wouldn’t have been possible without his unique skill set and approach to teamwork.

What This Means for the Legacy of LeBron

Is LeBron a "Passer" Rather Than a "Taker"?

Ultimately, Pippen’s comments leave us with an important question: is LeBron James really different from Jordan in terms of mentality, or is he just a different kind of player? It’s clear that LeBron has a style that’s more inclusive, focusing on making the right basketball play rather than always seeking the limelight. But that doesn't necessarily mean he isn't just as dominant. In fact, his versatility and ability to adapt to any situation may be his greatest strength.

LeBron's Place in NBA History

In the end, Pippen’s comments don’t take away from LeBron’s incredible career. Whether you agree with Pippen or not, there’s no denying LeBron’s status as one of the best players to ever play the game. Pippen’s perspective, though valid, serves as a reminder of how different leadership styles can impact the way we perceive greatness in basketball.

Honestly, it’s fascinating to hear these kinds of debates, especially from someone who has seen firsthand what it takes to win championships with the greatest of all time. LeBron may not always have the "killer instinct" that Jordan had, but his legacy is built on a broader skill set — one that’s allowed him to remain relevant and successful across multiple stages of his career.

In the end, both Jordan and LeBron are legends, and the debate about who is the greatest will continue for years to come.

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.