Do you title your conclusion in APA?

Do You Title Your Conclusion in APA? The Surprising Truth Revealed

The Basic Guidelines: Is a Title Necessary for the Conclusion?

Well, let’s dive straight into it. If you're writing an APA-style paper, you’ve probably had this question pop into your head at least once: Do I need to title my conclusion? I’ll be honest, when I first started using APA formatting, I wasn’t entirely sure. I mean, we title everything else, right? The introduction, the methods, the results… but the conclusion? Hmm, tricky. Let’s break it down.

The Structure of an APA Paper

Actually, before we go into the specifics of the conclusion, it’s important to refresh what an APA paper generally looks like. APA format usually includes distinct sections like:

• Title Page
• Abstract
• Introduction
• Methods
• Results
• Discussion
• Conclusion (sometimes, but not always, labeled explicitly)

Now, you might be thinking, "Hey, I see a lot of headings here—so why wouldn’t the conclusion have one too?" Let’s figure that out.

APA and Headings: The Lowdown

Alright, here’s the thing: According to the APA Publication Manual (7th edition), you generally do not title your conclusion if it’s part of the larger Discussion section. Why? Because in APA style, the Discussion section covers both the interpretation of the results and the conclusion. That means, no extra heading is needed.

But hold on! It’s not as cut and dry as that, so keep reading.

What About a Separate Conclusion Section?

Honestly, sometimes, it makes sense to have a conclusion that stands on its own. And if you decide to separate it, you can use a title for the section. In fact, many people do this if they want to give the reader a clear endpoint, especially in longer papers or dissertations. It could be labeled as “Conclusion” or something like “Final Thoughts,” but the key point here is that it’s a personal choice, not a strict APA requirement.

The Real Trick: Understanding the Purpose of Titles

I had a chat with my friend Sarah the other day—she’s finishing her thesis—and she was stressing out about whether to title her conclusion. She said, "But if I don’t title it, how will my reader know I’m wrapping things up?" I totally get it. Sometimes, it just feels cleaner to have a title for everything. But, here’s the thing: APA’s guidelines emphasize clarity and flow over decoration. The content of your conclusion should tell the reader you're concluding without needing a big title.

Can You Use "Conclusion" as a Title?

Now, if you still want to use a title for the conclusion, you can. Some professors or institutions might even prefer it. You’ll find it in some academic papers that the conclusion is clearly labeled as "Conclusion." Just be sure not to overdo it with unnecessary titles. Keep it simple. Consistency is key. If you title one section, title them all. If you don’t title the others, then your conclusion doesn’t need one either.

A Little Personal Story About Titles and Formatting

Okay, so here's a bit of a confession. When I was writing my first big research paper, I went a little overboard with the titles. I had everything from “Analysis of Results” to “Concluding Remarks.” I mean, it looked neat, but when I got feedback from my professor, she basically told me that less is more. Honestly, I wasn’t sure at first, but after a while, I realized how much cleaner the paper looked without all those extra headings. So yeah, I had to eat a bit of humble pie.

So, Do You Title Your Conclusion in APA or Not?

Well, to wrap it up (pun intended), if your conclusion is part of the Discussion section, there’s no need to give it a title in APA style. But, if you’ve separated it out as a distinct section, feel free to use "Conclusion" or a similar title—just keep it simple and clear. The key is to make your paper readable and professional, and that’s really what APA formatting is all about.

At the end of the day, don't stress too much about whether or not your conclusion gets a title. As long as you're following the general structure and your content is solid, you’re golden!

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.