Is Draco Really Evil?

I still remember the first time I read Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. I was around 10 years old, curled up under my blanket with a flashlight, completely lost in the world of Hogwarts. And then, I met Draco Malfoy.

From the moment he sneered at Harry in Madam Malkin’s robe shop, I was convinced: this guy was bad news. The slicked-back hair, the arrogance, the pureblood superiority complex—he had "villain" written all over him. But was he really evil? Or was he just a product of his environment?

Years later, after re-reading the books (and having endless debates with friends), I realized Draco’s story is far more complex than it first appears.

The Case for Draco Being Evil

Let’s start with the obvious: Draco Malfoy does a lot of awful things.

• He bullies Harry, Ron, and Hermione relentlessly, often targeting Hermione’s blood status.
• He tries to get Hagrid fired over Buckbeak’s incident.
• He joins Umbridge’s Inquisitorial Squad, basically acting as her lapdog.
• He laughs at Dumbledore’s death (or at least, appears to).

From a surface-level reading, he fits the mold of a classic bully: privileged, cruel, and arrogant. Many readers (especially when they first experience the series) see Draco as a mini Voldemort in the making—a Death Eater in training with no redeeming qualities.

But is it really that simple?

The Case for Draco Being Trapped

I once had a heated conversation with a friend about whether Draco was “redeemable.” She argued, “He’s a product of his upbringing. You can’t blame a kid for being raised in a household full of dark wizards.” And honestly? She had a point.

Draco wasn’t just some rich brat choosing to be mean. He was raised in a world where blood purity was law, where Voldemort was seen as a rightful leader, and where questioning authority could cost you your life. His father, Lucius Malfoy, was a high-ranking Death Eater. His mother, Narcissa, while less extreme, still upheld these values.

By the time Draco was old enough to think for himself, he was already trapped in a role he didn’t necessarily want. This becomes painfully clear in Half-Blood Prince, when Voldemort forces him to kill Dumbledore.

• He doesn’t want to do it—you can see his hesitation in every scene.
• He’s visibly terrified and losing weight from stress.
• In the Astronomy Tower scene, his hand is literally shaking as he points his wand at Dumbledore.

When I first read that moment, I felt something I never expected to feel for Draco Malfoy: sympathy. This wasn’t some smug school bully anymore. This was a kid who had no way out.

The Turning Point: Regret and Redemption

The final proof that Draco isn’t truly evil comes in Deathly Hallows.

During the Battle of Hogwarts, when Harry, Ron, and Hermione are captured and brought to Malfoy Manor, Draco is given a choice: identify Harry or stay silent. And what does he do?

He hesitates.

That moment speaks volumes. If Draco was truly evil, he would have handed Harry over without a second thought. Instead, he falters, showing that his loyalty to Voldemort was never genuine—it was fear.

Later, during the Room of Requirement scene, when the room is burning around them, Harry saves Draco's life. That moment is huge. Despite everything, Draco didn’t deserve to die, and Harry knew that.

And then, in the epilogue, we see Draco at King’s Cross with his wife and son, living a normal life—far removed from Voldemort’s ideology. That’s not the ending of a villain. That’s the ending of someone who was given a second chance and took it.

So, Is Draco Really Evil?

The answer isn’t black and white. Draco Malfoy was a bully, a coward at times, and deeply flawed. But was he truly evil? No. He was a victim of circumstance, someone born into a toxic ideology who didn’t know how to break free.

In the end, Draco wasn’t a hero—but he wasn’t a villain either. He was something much more realistic: a person shaped by his environment, struggling with fear and pressure, but ultimately capable of change.

And maybe, that’s what makes his story one of the most interesting in the entire Harry Potter series.

What do you think? Was Draco ever truly evil, or was he just a scared kid trying to survive? Let’s debate!

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.