Why is Fibromyalgia Not Recognized as a Disability?

Fibromyalgia. The name alone can send a shiver down anyone's spine who’s familiar with it. It’s one of those conditions that’s notoriously difficult to explain to someone who’s never experienced it. The constant pain, the exhaustion, the brain fog—it’s as if your body and mind are in a constant battle with each other. Yet, despite the very real and often debilitating symptoms, fibromyalgia isn’t always recognized as a disability. But why is that?

I mean, think about it. If you were to describe fibromyalgia to someone, you’d probably talk about the widespread musculoskeletal pain, the sensitivity to touch, the difficulty sleeping, and that overwhelming feeling of exhaustion. Yet, when it comes to officially labeling it as a disability, it often gets left out of the conversation. So what’s going on?

The Puzzle of Fibromyalgia: An Invisible Illness

First off, let’s acknowledge one uncomfortable truth: fibromyalgia is an "invisible" illness. There are no clear, visible signs that scream, "Hey, I’m really sick!" So, unlike conditions that are more easily recognized (like a broken leg or a severe skin disease), fibromyalgia’s symptoms can be hard to pinpoint. You don’t see the chronic pain on someone’s face, and there's no obvious evidence that someone’s struggling. And that makes it all the more difficult for others to understand, let alone for the system to classify it as a legitimate disability.

It’s frustrating because, on a day-to-day level, those living with fibromyalgia experience symptoms that can severely impact their quality of life. The pain, fatigue, and cognitive issues are enough to make everyday tasks feel like a marathon. But still, there’s no simple "test" to confirm fibromyalgia—no blood test, no scan—that makes it harder for doctors and authorities to accept it as a disability in some cases.

The Medical Community: Struggling with the Diagnosis

Okay, let’s be real. Even in the medical world, fibromyalgia doesn’t have the easiest reputation. It’s a bit like that person at a party who no one really knows what to do with. Doctors often struggle to diagnose it because its symptoms overlap with other conditions like chronic fatigue syndrome, arthritis, and even depression. This overlap can lead to misdiagnoses, and, in some unfortunate cases, some doctors might dismiss fibromyalgia as "all in your head."

This difficulty in diagnosing fibromyalgia creates a significant problem when it comes to qualifying for disability benefits. If doctors themselves are unsure about fibromyalgia, it becomes harder for patients to get the support they need. Some people, after years of being bounced from one specialist to the next, may never get an official diagnosis or face long delays, which doesn’t help when you’re trying to prove that you can’t work due to your condition.

Disability Systems: A Strict, One-Size-Fits-All Approach

Then, there’s the issue of disability systems themselves. Many countries have rigid criteria for what constitutes a disability, and fibromyalgia doesn’t always fit into these boxes. Disability programs often require measurable, clear-cut symptoms that show how someone is physically or mentally incapable of working. With fibromyalgia, that’s tricky. Sure, there’s pain, but it's not necessarily the same type of pain as, say, someone recovering from surgery or a car accident. The fatigue is real, but it's not always easily visible.

In the eyes of certain disability programs, fibromyalgia is sometimes seen as a "lesser" condition because it doesn’t have a visible or concrete medical test to validate it. And that’s just downright frustrating for anyone who’s living with it.

The Social Stigma: "But You Don’t Look Sick"

Here’s the thing no one likes to talk about: social stigma. We’ve all heard it at some point—"But you look fine!" or "Are you sure you’re not just tired?" These comments sting, don’t they? It’s as if people expect you to look sick in order to feel sick. But fibromyalgia isn’t like that. Just because you don’t see the pain doesn’t mean it’s not there. The "but you don’t look sick" mentality can be incredibly isolating, and it only adds to the stigma of fibromyalgia not being "real" enough to be considered a disability.

And let’s not even get started on the misconception that fibromyalgia is just a mental health issue, a byproduct of stress or anxiety. Sure, mental health plays a role, but fibromyalgia’s physical symptoms are very much real—and very, very painful. But the fact that it doesn’t fit neatly into one category, whether that’s physical or mental health, causes even more confusion in terms of how it’s recognized by disability systems.

How Can We Change This?

So, what’s the way forward? How do we get fibromyalgia recognized as a disability, if not for its visible symptoms, but for the very real impact it has on people’s lives? It starts with better awareness, both in the medical community and in the general public. People need to understand that fibromyalgia is a real, debilitating condition, and that just because you can’t see it doesn’t mean it’s not there.

Doctors need to take fibromyalgia more seriously, rather than brushing it off as an ambiguous illness or something that "will pass." Medical research is still catching up to the realities of living with fibromyalgia, but ongoing studies and increased public awareness could help move things in the right direction. The more doctors recognize the true nature of the disease, the easier it will be for patients to seek the proper care and documentation to qualify for disability support.

On a policy level, governments need to reconsider how disability systems assess chronic, invisible illnesses like fibromyalgia. A more nuanced approach that takes into account the long-term, disabling nature of conditions like this—without the need for an immediate, visible symptom—would be a huge step forward.

Final Thoughts: Recognizing Fibromyalgia as a Disability is Long Overdue

To be clear, I’m not suggesting fibromyalgia should be the "golden ticket" to disability benefits for everyone with the condition. But the fact that so many people with fibromyalgia are unable to access the support they need—and that their struggles are dismissed or misunderstood—is a problem that needs to be addressed. It’s time for the world to recognize that the pain and exhaustion that come with fibromyalgia are just as valid as any other medical condition that leads to disability.

Until then, it’s up to all of us to raise awareness, challenge misconceptions, and advocate for the changes that need to happen. Fibromyalgia may not always have a clear "evidence-based" test to diagnose it, but the lived experiences of those who suffer from it are more than enough to prove that it deserves to be recognized as a disability.

So, next time someone tells you "you don’t look sick," maybe take a deep breath... and remind them that appearances can be deceiving.

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.