What Is the Biggest Difference Between Buddhism and Christianity?

Same questions, wildly different answers

Honestly, I’ve always been fascinated by how two world religions like Buddhism and Christianity can both dive deep into life’s biggest questions—suffering, purpose, what happens after we die—and yet give totally different answers.

The biggest difference? Well, it took me a while (and some late-night debates with my friend Alex, who’s a practicing Buddhist), but I think it boils down to this:
The idea of God. Or more precisely, the presence—or total absence—of one.

Christianity: God is everything

A personal, all-powerful creator

In Christianity, God is central. Like, the center of the universe kind of central. He created everything, sees everything, loves you personally, and—this part gets deep—sent His Son, Jesus, to save humanity.

For Christians, the path to salvation is through faith in God and Jesus Christ. There’s a clear sense of relationship: God as a Father, Jesus as a Savior, prayer as a dialogue.

I grew up in a mostly Christian family, and I remember how comforting that could feel. Like, no matter how chaotic life got, there was this higher presence watching over me. It didn’t always make sense (especially during rough times), but it gave a sort of structure. A backbone.

Buddhism: no creator, no divine judge

It’s not about believing in something—it’s about waking up

Buddhism, on the other hand, doesn’t center around a God. Actually, traditional Buddhism doesn’t even deal with a creator at all. Instead, it focuses on the self, the mind, and the nature of reality. The goal? Not to be “saved,” but to become enlightened—to wake up from suffering and illusion.

When Alex explained this to me, I was like, Wait… so there’s no God to pray to?
And he just smiled and said, “Nope. It’s not about faith. It’s about practice.”

Buddhists follow teachings like the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path to gradually reduce suffering and detach from desire. It’s kind of like mental training. Very internal, very self-aware.

So what’s the actual, biggest difference?

One seeks divine salvation. The other seeks inner liberation.

That’s really the core of it, I think. Christianity says: Surrender to God’s will, accept Jesus, and your sins are forgiven.
Buddhism says: Look within. Understand your mind. And through discipline and awareness, you can end suffering.

It’s like two roads going in completely different directions—yet somehow both trying to lead toward peace.

And here’s the thing I didn’t expect: they both require deep commitment. Whether you’re kneeling in prayer or sitting in meditation, both ask you to show up, reflect, and grow.

But wait… can’t someone believe in both?

Syncretism vs contradiction

I actually asked this once during a philosophy class (I was that annoying kid, I know), and the professor gave me a really interesting answer:
“You can appreciate both. You can learn from both. But full belief in both? That’s harder.”

Because yeah—believing in a personal God and believing there’s no need for God? That’s a bit of a contradiction. But practicing elements of both? That’s totally doable. I’ve met Christians who meditate daily, and Buddhists who believe in a higher cosmic force, even if it’s not “God” in the Christian sense.

Final thoughts (and a little doubt I still carry)

So, is the biggest difference the belief in God? I still think yes. But honestly… sometimes I wonder if that’s just the obvious difference.

Because when you get into it, Christianity and Buddhism also differ in how they see the self, time, even what “salvation” means. It’s like comparing apples and… enlightenment.

But I do know this: both traditions offer something powerful. One speaks to the heart. The other speaks to the mind. And somewhere in between, maybe we all find our own truth.

In the end? The biggest difference between Buddhism and Christianity is simple yet massive:
Christianity depends on a personal God. Buddhism doesn’t.

That single distinction shapes everything—from how you pray, to why you suffer, to where you believe you're going after this life ends.
And if that’s not a big difference, I don’t know what is.

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.