Was Alauddin Khilji a Good Man or Just a Ruthless Ruler?

Trying to define “good” in the shadow of a sultan

Honestly, I didn’t expect to be so torn over this question. “Was Alauddin Khilji a good man?” sounds like a simple yes or no. But then you start digging into history — into wars, reforms, betrayals, taxes, and paranoia — and suddenly that yes or no turns into a long, awkward “well… depends.”

I remember chatting with my friend Aamir (a total history nerd) about Khilji one evening. I casually said, “He was a tyrant, right?” And Aamir just raised an eyebrow and said, “Depends if you were a peasant or a noble.”

Let’s talk about that.

The visionary administrator (yeah, he wasn’t all bad)

Price control and market reforms

One thing you can’t take away from Alauddin Khilji: the man knew how to run an empire. His price control system? Super strict, but also kinda genius. He regulated the price of grains, cloth, horses — you name it — to stop inflation and keep the army fed.

And guess what? It actually worked. The market system he put in place was one of the most advanced for its time. Aamir once joked that Khilji would've made a killer finance minister.

But yeah… he also punished corrupt merchants brutally. We’re talking lashes, public shaming — the whole medieval package.

Cracking down on corruption (but in his own brutal way)

Khilji didn’t trust his own nobility. Not even a little. He removed land grants, cut salaries, and installed spies everywhere. It kept rebellions down, sure, but also made people paranoid as hell.

So was he a “good man” for trying to control corruption? Or a dictator who ruled through fear?

Ugh. It’s messy.

The ruthless military genius

Conqueror of Deccan, breaker of Rajput pride

If you were a rival king, “good” would be the last word you’d use for Alauddin. He defeated the Rajputs at Ranthambore, Chittor — brutal, decisive, no mercy. His campaigns in the south were legendary, even though he didn’t go himself.

Was it strategy? Yes. Was it violent? Absolutely. I mean, there’s even debate about what happened with Rani Padmini and the siege of Chittor — but even if you strip away the legends, the conquest was ruthless.

And then there was his treatment of Mongols. He crushed them. Repeatedly. And punished their settlements so severely that no one dared return.

So... war crimes? Or just war?

It’s hard to judge a 14th-century ruler by 21st-century morals. Still, sometimes, reading about Khilji’s campaigns, I’d catch myself wincing. I’d think, “Did he really have to go that far?” And then I’d remember — survival in that era meant being feared more than loved.

Khilji the man: paranoid, brilliant, dangerous

Obsessed with control

What’s weird is, even at the height of his power, Alauddin Khilji never really felt safe. He didn’t trust anyone. Not his nobles. Not his wives. Not even his sons.

He banned alcohol in court. He stopped people from gathering in private. He had spies everywhere. Honestly, sounds exhausting to live like that.

Sometimes I wonder if he was haunted by something — like the fear of being betrayed. Maybe that’s what made him so harsh.

Legacy of fear — and brilliance

Khilji died alone, suspicious of everyone, leaving behind a massive empire… and a reputation that no one really agrees on. Was he a tyrant? A reformer? A paranoid genius?

So… was he a good man?

Look, if you want the clean version: no, Alauddin Khilji wasn’t a “good man” in the moral sense. He was violent, suspicious, and sometimes straight-up cruel.

But was he an effective ruler? Definitely.

And if you were a farmer under his rule, and food was cheaper, taxes fairer, and Mongols not attacking you every six months… maybe you’d say yes. He was a good man — for his people, at least.

History’s complicated like that.

And honestly, I’m still not sure where I stand. Ask me again next week — I might say something totally different.

Is 165 cm normal for a 15 year old?

The predicted height for a female, based on your parents heights, is 155 to 165cm. Most 15 year old girls are nearly done growing. I was too. It's a very normal height for a girl.

Is 160 cm too tall for a 12 year old?

How Tall Should a 12 Year Old Be? We can only speak to national average heights here in North America, whereby, a 12 year old girl would be between 137 cm to 162 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/3 feet). A 12 year old boy should be between 137 cm to 160 cm tall (4-1/2 to 5-1/4 feet).

How tall is a average 15 year old?

Average Height to Weight for Teenage Boys - 13 to 20 Years

How to get taller at 18?

Staying physically active is even more essential from childhood to grow and improve overall health. But taking it up even in adulthood can help you add a few inches to your height. Strength-building exercises, yoga, jumping rope, and biking all can help to increase your flexibility and grow a few inches taller.

Is 5.7 a good height for a 15 year old boy?

Generally speaking, the average height for 15 year olds girls is 62.9 inches (or 159.7 cm). On the other hand, teen boys at the age of 15 have a much higher average height, which is 67.0 inches (or 170.1 cm).

Can you grow between 16 and 18?

Most girls stop growing taller by age 14 or 15. However, after their early teenage growth spurt, boys continue gaining height at a gradual pace until around 18. Note that some kids will stop growing earlier and others may keep growing a year or two more.

Can you grow 1 cm after 17?

Even with a healthy diet, most people's height won't increase after age 18 to 20. The graph below shows the rate of growth from birth to age 20. As you can see, the growth lines fall to zero between ages 18 and 20 ( 7 , 8 ). The reason why your height stops increasing is your bones, specifically your growth plates.